Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
@mac48025 - Hmmmm...curious. You know, I can't remember exactly what Eric said, but he said that the ports on the back of his speakers don't act as usual ports. I'm not sure what that was about, but maybe @tektondesign design can talk a little bit about that. Because, as is, they seem to exhibit characteristics of full range single drivers that I've played with, inasmuch as sure, they sound better out in the room, but you can get them pretty darn close to the wall. I mean, it can't be magick. There has to be some science behind it. 

At any rate, I'm committing myself to at least learning the basics of the Sumiko method of speaker placement, because it should work in any room, to let the speaker/room pressure paradigm play itself out in a natural way.Then add room correction and/or treatment as needed...*if* needed!

The only speakers I have in-house as the moment are Dynaudio 340s, so if I play around with them an the Sumkio method and come out aces, with better SQ, I would imagine the mini-Ulfs would work much better, whether the room dictates a few inches or a few feet.

http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=60819.0 

Please note this is not a personal attack on Jeffery just a strong comment on his setup of his Ulf's:

Are you freaking serious!  I would not setup an inexpensive pair of speakers the way this 12K world class speaker is placed in this room.  Any rear ported speaker should at least be, if possible around two feet off the front wall, otherwise you muddy up the bass big time.  By having the inner front edge of the Ulf's parallel to the cabinet would totally negate the speakers ability to develop center fill and a deep soundstaging.  They also are quite close to the side walls/corners that would create early disruptive reflections and again interfere with overall clarity, imaging and lead to a booming/muddy bass response.

Certainly, there are speaker designs that are designed to be placed right on the front wall to develop their soundstages, but the Ulf's is not one of them.  I have heard the DI's setup in a very similar fashion and found that their performance was tremendously effected negatively in that system.

Without using room treatments the closest I would place the DI's or Ulf's to the front wall would be, if possible, at least two and a half feet, and from the side walls at least the same distance.  I'm very lucky in that I have a special acoustic space both in size and how much wood is used throughout the room which leads to a very natural acoustic environment for any speaker I review.  It saddens me that this proud owner of these very special speakers will not really hear the magic of what the Ulf's can do if placed in the correct position in the right sized room.

It's like putting a world class racing horse in a kiddy corral dooming him never to run free at his total potential /speed.     
Wow Jeffery with a setup like that you can claim the Ulf's are 25 to 30 % better than the DI's. I strongly think not.

Just constructive criticism not meant to be a personal attack.


Kenny.
Post removed