2. home-theater
  3. 1213991864

HDMI vs 5.1 analog connection

My processor is not HDMI audio capable....but it has 5.1 analog to connect to my Blu Ray player.

Theoretically or realistically, which will yeild the best sound, HDMI or the 5.1 analog connection?

Should I look to get a processor with HDMI audio or is the 5.1 analog as good?

Also, does digital coax cable produce better sound than an optical cable?
128x128mitch4t
mitch4t's avatar
mitch4t OP
1,602 posts
 
Kr4....Yes, the player does decode the HD audio tracks.

I was referring to any and all surround modes currently available on Blu Ray and and standard def dvd's..including the hi-def surround modes.
kr4's avatar
kr4
3,649 posts
 
OK. Then the issue of whether HDMI or 5.1 is "better" depends on whether you want to use the DSP/bass management in the processor. I believe that, with modern equipment, it is advisable to use HDMI and let the processor handle as much as possible.
rwwear
2,847 posts
 
If you want to be able to play back HD audio in 7.1 you will need a processor with 7.1 ins or HDMI and 7.1 channels. When using the 7.1 inputs you will be bypassing the surround modes in the processor or receiver and only be using the player's settings. There are other ways to do it but they are cumbersome.
mrmikesmail
37 posts
 
It depends on the quality of the player. A cheap player will no doubt benefit form letting a higher quality proccessor do the work. A proccessor may also have bass management and room correction.
sparks81
19 posts
 
Mitch4t, Re: Coax vs. Optical
There are some variables to consider... i.e., the quality of your speakers and the rest of your electronics (most specifically your "source component." However, generally speaking, Coax has a wider band-width. and it has been my experience to higher sound quality from a good coax cable.
More to discover