Artists' lps that don't get the respect deserved


Allman Brothers "Enlightened Rouges".  I've always enjoyed this one. It's always a treat to listen to and has great sonics. To beat it all, it's easily found used. In fact, I'm listening right now. (Is it because Don Johnson has some credits?) Thoughts? Suggestions? More importantly, put it on and enjoy!
128x128slaw
Loomis,

Another good thought from you (not unusual) for this thread: Albums that are often relegated to the bottom of that artist's catalog, but perhaps shouldn't be.  "Red Ledge" is a good example.  "War Babies" is another Hall & Oates record that qualifies IMO.  

They were just starting to really break through and tho  I think War Babies charted, it was  so radically different sounding than their first two (excellent) records that I'm sure it chased lots of potential fans away.  Still love it, tho.  It may be their least commercial sounding record, but I also think it's their most adventurous.
thanks guys. i was never a huge h&o fan, mainly because of o's mustache, but the hall projects "sacred songs" and "exposure" (both with fripp) were pretty great--weirder and more exploratory than you would think.
i'll toss out two more undeservedly bottom of the catalog disk, then get back to drinking myself insensible:
elliott easton, change no change--this was the solo turn by the cars' lefthanded guitarist. it seemed to have been virtually unheard (+ not avialable on spotify), and it got an oddly negative review on allmusic, who hate his singing, but i think it's a great record--the songs were cowritten with the great jules shear and are hooky as hell
townsend/lane, rough mix--no disrespect to the who, but their bombast and operatic seriousness can get fatiguing if you're in the wrong mood + i always preferred townsend's vocals to daltrey's. this one is a much looser, folksier  affair than the who or the faces, and sounds fresh 40 years after its release. for some odd reason, "keep me turning" always brings me to tears.
Hard to keep up with all the good recommendations Loomis spins off.  Have War Babies playing now, Marty.  Me personally - I prefer their early/'70s stuff (Whole Oats is a good 'un too).  Less enthralled with their '80s output when they found their hit making formula....still some good stuff there too if you listen past the overexposed radio hits.  
I love Gentle Giant and Giant for a Day I really enjoy listening to and In'terview is cool to. 

Bardo Pond, wow that brings some cloudy memories back,haven't thought about them in awhile. Thanks for reminder I need to partake of some of that more often. 

Ry Cooder-Showtime, I wish I could have been there. 

"the who---their bombast and operatic and operatic seriousness can get fatiguing". Ain’t it the truth! That trait spoiled The Who for me when it appeared in the "Won’t Get Fooled Again" era, though "Tommy" hinted at it. Townshend’s writing became more deliberate and contrived (though Tommy really started it, his pre-Tommy writing being very different), and he started relying on that damn synthesizer, something I found glaringly out-of-place in The Who. And Daltry started holding his notes far too long, to the point of his voice becoming hoary (it had merely been the group’s weak point, but was now actually a disqualifier for top-tier Rock Band status imo). And that "Yeeeeeaaaaahhhhh!" in "WGFA" is just so corny. And, as LJ said, bombastic.

To me The Who’s forte was the 2-1/2---3 minute Power Pop song, crisp teenage anthems. Moon’s drumming also took a turn for the worse after Tommy---sluggish, with his snare 2/4 backbeat at the back end of the pocket rather than at the front where it had been, following the band’s pulse rather than leading it, as it had been up to Tommy (in Tommy it is right about in the pocket’s center, creating a deep groove they hadn’t before had). And his fills, rather than the brief mostly-snare drum flourishes of his earlier playing, became overly-long, pointless tom-tom plod-fests. I saw them live on the ’68 "A Quick One" tour, and he and they were bursting with kinetic energy. Then the ’69 "Tommy" tour, where it was still in evidence, but starting to slip away. By the time of "WGFA" it was gone. It sounded like they were swinging for the bleachers, trying too hard. But of course I was in the minority with that opinion, as they were gaining in popularity, not declining. As with most artists/groups/bands, I find their early work far superior to their later.