Arcam A32 vs. ML 383, Macintosh MA6900, YBA, other

I have the YBA Passion Integre. I've auditioned everything before I bought this baby. No experience with the Arcam so I can't help you, there. My review, on the Passion, is in the Archives. This amp is warm, tubelike, with all the advantages of ss. It's got it all. I owned an Integre for 7 years, and now this baby. I was going to say, if your funds are not up to this (the original Integre, possibly), but I see you're entertaining the ML and Mac. I don't want to fall into the trap, exclaiming how much better this integrated is than what you've mentioned, so let me say humbly, I liked the Passion better. A lot better. You can email me with any questions. good luck
warren

I auditioned the 383 side by side with the MA6900 and liked the McIntosh better. It just had more body and presence. They were playing B&W N802s with MIT oracle cables and Meridian CDP. They were both excellent but the Mc just made my feet tap and my face smile. Only heard the AR Complete and it was too lean as well - YBA perhaps better(?). Arthur

As an owner of the 383, I usually read most posts about it and other integrated’s in its category and I hear a wide gamut of thoughts and outcomes. You have listed some nice integrated amps and I am sure all are good, but with the wide range of results I have read, it leads me to believe it will more than likely come down to what works best with the rest of your system and your personal liking.

Like you, I don’t have a lot of shops in my area, so if I ever want to try something, it is very difficult. As the previous poster said, he found he liked the Mac better with his 802’s; I recently conversed with another gentleman that tried both the 383 and the 6900, (in his system, this is rare, most comments are based on different systems), and he found the 383 more musical but liked to rock out and the extra power of the Mac allowed him to do so, so he went for what worked with him.