I agree that R2R is a great format. My 1980s recordings are really low noise and have the breath of real life.
I have dozens of 1950s pre-recorded 2 and 4 track 7.5 ips tapes that are super dynamic and open sounding.
I also have about 100 1960s 3.5 ips pre-recorded 4 track tapes that are okay, not great. Especially classical music where all sorts of shenanigans occurred (e.g. Bruckner Sym. 5 with Klemperer-the 4th movement has a sudden lower volume at tuttis versus the LP and CD versions). I suspect little effort to make the 3.5 ips tapes was done. Hiss is also prominent. The 7.5 ips 1960s tapes are pretty good and dynamic but mostly pop music. With over 500 pre-recorded cassettes, they do not sound wonderful to me on my Nakamichi ZX7, especially classical. My own non-Dolby recordings made on a Tandberg 310 sound wonderful played back on the ZX7 with very very faint hiss. Tape quality and live source makes a huge difference.
I have dozens of 1950s pre-recorded 2 and 4 track 7.5 ips tapes that are super dynamic and open sounding.
I also have about 100 1960s 3.5 ips pre-recorded 4 track tapes that are okay, not great. Especially classical music where all sorts of shenanigans occurred (e.g. Bruckner Sym. 5 with Klemperer-the 4th movement has a sudden lower volume at tuttis versus the LP and CD versions). I suspect little effort to make the 3.5 ips tapes was done. Hiss is also prominent. The 7.5 ips 1960s tapes are pretty good and dynamic but mostly pop music. With over 500 pre-recorded cassettes, they do not sound wonderful to me on my Nakamichi ZX7, especially classical. My own non-Dolby recordings made on a Tandberg 310 sound wonderful played back on the ZX7 with very very faint hiss. Tape quality and live source makes a huge difference.