Totem Hawks vs. Forest


Hi,

I am considering the above Totem speakers, used in a 14x19 room. I listen to mostly jazz and some vocals. If anyone has opinions, or has compared the two, I would like to here what you think.
also... The articles I have read on the forest from magazines say that they contain a sea's tweeter and either and ATI woofer or dynaudio. The forest that I have seen contains a MB tweeter, and a Hi-vi research woofer. Was there a change to the forest, from when it originally came out.
System: Classe 301
joule la100
audio research cd-2

Thanks!
JKW1

jkw1

Showing 2 responses by audiophile33

I used to sell totem and own the Forests. All in all the Forest is a significantly better speaker. The drivers have been changed a couple times from introduction, they now use a seas tweeter and ATI mid-driver. Harmonics, rhythm, and overall sound is better then the model 1 IMO. The only speakers that best it are the Mani-2, Wind, and Shaman. You will need much more amplification and better upstream components to extract maximum performance out of the aforementioned. I have my Forest matched up with a Simaudio I-5. Check out my system. The Hawks are nice, but the Forests are a considerable step up IMO.
The model 1 is no slouch, but if your musical preference varies like mine, the Forest is the more flexible speaker. I listen to a lot of classic rock, new age, celtic, electronic, classical, jazz and the Forest never ceases to impress me. The Model 1 is superb on vocals, jazz, and acousticÂ…of all the listening tests, demos, comparisons when selling these speakers the forest always seemed to pull ahead in all departments.