Testing the Yamamoto HS-4 Carbon Fiber headshell.


Received the Yamamoto HS-4 Carbon Fiber headshell today and tried it on my 12" Jelco 850L. I guess this is a common upgrade path for many Jelco users so I succumbed to temptation.
Turntable is a modified Garrard 401 in a slate plinth on a maple and concrete support with new third party bearing, platter and idler.
I tested it with my Decca "Garrott Brothers Microscanner" Gold with new line contact stylus and Decapod.
Three records were played. Ketty Lester - Love Letters (1962), Cole/Davinport/Tate/Dickenson - French Festival Nice France 1974, Buddy Tate - The Great Buddy Tate (1981).
I played sample tracks from the records before swapping the standard magnesium Jelco headshell out. From the first needle drop using the Yamamoto, there was a soft grey veiling. Not a great start. There was definitely greater depth and improved bass - I could hear the kick drum pedal hitting the skin in a very specific location and acoustic bass was well delineated and easier to follow. Soundstage was more of a wall of sound with greater height. I remember the same effect using grey plate Sylvania Gold 5751s once which are acclaimed but not to my taste. Female vocals didn’t have the articulation and airy projection I normally experienced and it was that which forced me to stop going any further and I duly put the original shell back. The greyness was gone, replaced by a transparent black background and what I can only call a vast increase in precision and focus. I deliberately didn’t mention the mids and highs with the HS-4 simply because they were compromised and wholly unsatisfactory. With the Jelco, the tremendous detail returned: The color and metallic shimmer of cymbals, the beauty of vocal inflection, instruments speed and clarity. Piano hammers sounded fast and believable. But most importantly, dynamic range now soared with startling realism. That bass drum is not as clearly evident and it is the one area I’ll give to the Yamamoto. Make no mistake though, this carbon fiber headshell was an enormous fail for me. I can only assume the material imparted its soft plasticky sonic signature onto the music. Not recommended.

128x128noromance

Showing 5 responses by chakster

I bought the latest incarnation of Boston Audio mat made in collaboration with 47 Labs (Sakura Systems). This model called The Mat. It is perfect for Luxman PD-444 platter. I am comparing it to my SAEC SS-300, but need time for comparison. I do not agree with noromance catigorical statement. 

Regarding carbon headshells i know many, i like this one from Grace, it's carbon-fiber. Nothing new here, it's from the 80's. I like this design much better than any Yamamoto.   
I want to make it clear, you guys are talking about different materials ... Carbon-Fiber, Pure Carbon, Carbon-Graphite, Graphite etc ...

I remember headshells from OMA (Graphite) and from Thomas Schick (also Graphite) and they are different. Not to mention Graphite plinth.

I’ve seen some new carbon-fiber mat and the structure is way different that Boston Audio Graphite mat.

The designers of Boston Audio Mat explained many things here (see below), also BA mat has been upgraded 2 times since it’s first release, the latest is The Mat.

"It’s also important to understand that true carbon-graphite is not "graphite" as in carbon fiber golf clubs, tennis rackets, etc. While such products are often mistakenly called graphite, carbon fiber is a composite material with totally different mechanical properties than pure carbon-graphite.

The Mat - the last component in the record support system and the only part of the turntable capable of dealing with stylus-induced oscillation.
The stylus oscillates while reading the millions of bumps and ridges within the groove, it consequently releases a portion of that vibration back into the vinyl itself (the opposite reaction).
These vibrations saturate the vinyl and bounce off the platter and back to the stylus.

Even in the most rigorously setup and isolated turntables, stylus oscillation is a source of distortion that is hard to avoid.

Felt mats do dampen some of the vibrations generated by the stylus and help to insulate the record from the platter because of its low mass. But precisely because of felt’s extremely low mass, its effectiveness is limited.
Our search ultimately led us to a rather exotic material for a turntable mat - pure carbon in the form of graphite.

Graphite also offers one of the lowest mechanical impedance of any material in existence. Simply put, mechanical impedance is a material’s resistance to energy. Graphite’s low mechanical impedance means that energy may freely enter the material, but its loosely bound molecular layers are very efficient in absorbing and dissipating energy - be it neutrons generated by a nuclear reaction or micro-vibrations from a stylus.

In addition to absorbing and dissipating stylus oscillation, graphite is excellent at absorbing turntable-produced contamination including bearing and pulley imperfections, motor noise, platter ring and even noise generated by the belt turning the platter."


Here is a manufacturing tour.




Now let me compare:

1)

Yamamoto Carbon-Fiber headshell 

Carbon-Fiber turntable mat 

Another Oyaide Carbon-Fiber headshell 

Looking at all those pictures do you see some similarities ? 
The structure of Carbon-Fiber is the same, just like this sheet



2)

Now look at the Graphite mat, here is mine, but you can also look here

This is OMA Graphite headshell and OMA Graphite Mat

Thomas Schick Graphite headshell. 

And let me remind you about rare Grace Carbon-Fiber headshell. 


And let me summarize: 

The material used for products in chapter 1 is completely different from the material used for products chapter 2. Even if the Yamamoto headshell and Grace headshell advertised as Carbon-Fiber it is obvious that they are completely different and therefore have different properties. Same about Carbon-Fiber mat from chapter 1 and Boston Audio & Sakura Systems Graphite mat from chapter 2. 

I've been told that OMA Graphite headshell is also different from the Schick Graphite headshell. 

In other words saying something about Yamamoto Carbon-Fiber headshell you can't project it to the Boston Audio Graphite mat. They are made of the different material. 




First of all: here is a shop in Japan, it’s official Yamamoto distributor, not only for his beautiful tube amps, but also for the headshells that international buyers can purchase without tax (VAT) directly from Japan.
@lewm

I am not sure I get your point. Who is it that confused the graphite Boston Audio record mat for the carbon fiber Yamamoto (or Oyaide, or etc) headshell?


"Pure carbon in the form of graphite.

True carbon-graphite is not "graphite" as in carbon fiber golf clubs, tennis rackets, etc.

While such products are often mistakenly called graphite, carbon fiber is a composite material with totally different mechanical properties than pure carbon-graphite.

Commonly used in industrial applications including nuclear power plants and steel mills because of its high thermal conductivity, graphite is made from carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal, honeycomb pattern that are tightly bound in ultra-thin sheets. These sheets are themselves very loosely bound to one another - which is why powdered graphite is one of the best industrial lubricants in existence - and one of the reasons graphite is so effective at absorbing energy."


In addition to my two Yamamoto CF headshells, I also own the Oyaide one, just to see for myself if there is any qualitative difference in their sound(s). So far, no.

Both your your headshells called Carbon-Fiber and both share the same structure with a typical (for everything called CF nowadays) cubic surface. You can see same surface even on cars. It’s funny, but i can see even CF hats.

But Noromance does not like either the graphite mat nor the CF headshell, and he knows the difference. Bill Stevenson doesn’t like the CF headshell either. You, Halcro, and I do like the CF headshell.

I like my vintage Grace Carbon-Fiber headshell from the 80’s, but it has nothing to do with modern Yamamoto or Oyaide. The Grace CF headshell looks like my Graphite Mat or those new Graphite headshells from OMA and Schick. All those products does not have that cubic structure (you have on yamamoto) and probably made of the different material, different formula, different properties as explained by Boston Audio.

The sticker on the Original Grace box says "Carbon-Fiber Headshell", but again this is not the same material as the Yamamoto or Oyaide.

This is why i think we’re talking about different things here and what i like is not what you like because the CF is different too.

The BA mat and OMA mats made from a slice of Graphite, here is the manufacturing process. They call it Carbon-Graphite.

But the Carbon-Fiber mat is completely different, just like the CF headshell you guys have.

The Grace shell i like officially called CF, but does not looks like any new CF products.

I can’t say anything bad about The Mat (which is BA mk3), but even this mat is not what some of you guys owned, because it is not BA-1 or BA-2, it is "BA-3" under SakuraSystems brand now.