2. speakers
  3. 1166653500

Second round of auditions under my belt

I had the opportunity to audition a handful of speakers the other day, and although my listening session was brief, I did get a feel for the "sonic signature" of several popular models. I didn’t pay much attention to the associated equipment:

Von Schweikert VR4jr – As a prior owner of the original VR4’s, I was intrigued by all the hype surrounding VSR’s current designs. Powered by solid state amplification, the “junior” bettered my original VR4’s in the midrange, and were slightly better in the mid-bass, but there’s no mistaking that these are VSR designs. Very heavy in the bass, they just aren’t able to present instruments in their individual form, and they still lack punch and percussive detail. Their bass-heaviness “blends” the low end of the spectrum which makes the system sound slow and lethargic, just like my original VR4’s. It also strips the mid-bass region of detail, so the overall presentation is anything but seamless.

Nola Viper 2 – I’m sorry to say, but I couldn’t even get through a whole song on these speakers. They were very, very thick in the mid-bass, the midrange was “nasaly,” and the highs left something to be desired. They were punchy, but so out of balance that listener fatigue set in immediately. Easily the worst of the bunch (to my ears).

Gallo Ref 3.1 – I expected quite a bit out of these speakers, given all the rave reviews, but I was totally unimpressed. They generate an enormous soundstage, but I found the presentation also out of balance. There’s a bump in the mid-bass that really overwhelmed the rest of the systems qualities, and their performance with vocals was also average. Definitely not my cup of tea.

Usher 6381 – Powered by Cary tube equipment, and exquisitely finished, this is a neat pair of speakers. Tight, punchy, extended bass, coupled with a wonderful, open midrange, extended highs, and detail out the wazoo from top to bottom. One of the best balanced conventional designs I’ve heard in a long time. Individual instruments were set in space very nicely, and the system was very fast, so intricate details were extracted that the other systems left behind.

In a nutshell, the Usher handily outperformed the other systems, at what would be considered a pretty decent price, given that MSRP’s of $10K+ for run-of-the-mill speakers are a dime a dozen these days. Of course, these are my opinions, using my ears!
seadweller

Showing 2 responses by seadweller

seadweller OP
55 posts
 
I agree 100% that room placment and associated equipment have a huge impact, however I have two comments:

1. You would hope that a dealer would do his best to make sure systems are reasonably well matched, and that speakers are placed to maximize their performance. I'm sure there are exceptions, but in general, you would think this to be the case. All of the speakers were placed where the typical user would have them placed in a typical room, so if a speaker needs to be hung from the ceiling, from gold twine, to sound good, well.....

2. I also agree that an abbreviated session doesn't flesh out everything, but I'm of the opinion that all speakers have a distinct, overall sonic signature. This is related directly to the design and desired voicing by the designer, regardless of placement or associated equipment. This sonic signature can be massaged, but not changed (a Zebra doesn't change its stripes). For example, the VSR 4jr's are so close in balance to my original VR4's that it's obvious their presentation is a deliberate design consideration.
seadweller OP
55 posts
 
Goatwuss, you are indeed correct, it truly is hard finding an excellent pair of speakers, particularly if you're not in the mood to spend $20K.

I've now listened to around 10 conventional designs, ranging in price from $2K to around $8K, and none presented the music as if it were alive and breathing. It's time that I move on to some horn systems to see if they can reproduce that live performance I'm seeking.
More to discover