Hi,
I've had Krell 250's and now have the 280CD. There's only one flaw. The 280 seems to give a near field experience that is less intense. having said that, "step back!" The Bass is deeper and clearer, mids are slightly more sweet, and the highs take th ceiling off. Not take the paint off, but they raise the height of your room's sound scape.
The sound is more forward, and goes back farther and also widens. My point, the player can make even more of a diff than you've noticed and you'll have to see the forest for the trees to observe this next step. I do alot of near field, and like the 280 in that, but when ever i am past the 6 foot mark I'm swimming in image.
I've had Krell 250's and now have the 280CD. There's only one flaw. The 280 seems to give a near field experience that is less intense. having said that, "step back!" The Bass is deeper and clearer, mids are slightly more sweet, and the highs take th ceiling off. Not take the paint off, but they raise the height of your room's sound scape.
The sound is more forward, and goes back farther and also widens. My point, the player can make even more of a diff than you've noticed and you'll have to see the forest for the trees to observe this next step. I do alot of near field, and like the 280 in that, but when ever i am past the 6 foot mark I'm swimming in image.