2. digital
  3. 1367755264

Linn majik ds + mark levinson 360 vs akurate ds

Greetngs...

I think I have seem several thread silimar to this one.. But I can't seem to find the one with the dac i own..

I have compelete Mark Levinson system with 23.5 + 26s + 360, and this is because I love the sonic quality and characteristics that mark levinson combination offer.

Like many of you most of my sources are now stored in files, and I am planning to get a Linn ds.

I have narrowed down my options to majik and akurate, (not ds1). It seems i cannot use my ml360 if i go with akurate, and as we know the price difference is quite big...

Majik and Akurate both have built in dac, and I am guessing the big price comes from the quality of this built in dac. Just by looking at the transport ability.. would there be a big difference?

I would be very confident with my choice of majik + 360, if I can have assurance that their digital processing mechanism is indifferent.

It would be great to hear some opinions from the linn experts.

Thank you..
znwy79

Showing 2 responses by hk_fan

Ag insider logo xs@2x
hk_fan
416 posts
 
I think the only way you can answer this question is to audition both combinations and answer it for yourself.

I've owned Levinson and Linn digital and they are both good, but different.
Ag insider logo xs@2x
hk_fan
416 posts
 
In my experience ML has more weight that Linn. Not that Linn is thin necessarily, but it's not quite as rich as ML. ML is a tad darker while Linn is lighter on it's toes.

It's difficult to accurately describe so you really do need to listen to this combination to determine if you would like it.
More to discover