Is a Step-up Transformer needed?

Czarivey, I agree HOMCs are tempting. I've had 4 of them... but so far none compete with my favorite LOMCs. Only one of them is in the ballpark, but it's warming the bench. But that might just be my limited experience.

Thanks John for the clarification. Every time I check this forum I learn things.

I was hyperbolic stating that SUTs have NO distortion -- but would you say they have less? Or merely different?

Similarly I was inaccurate in describing noise in head-amps. But do you think eliminating the noise coming from the standard 120V our utility companies give us does have benefits, and batteries can bring an improvement?

As I mentioned, I personally hear little difference, if any, so I'm just musing on theory...

SUTs are 'pure' — head-amps add distortion

Transformers are NOT without their own distortion. Some just prefer that to the distortions generated by active devices such as FETs.

Some head-amps use batteries to solve the noise issue.

Batteries will not eliminate the inherent thermal noise of the individual components themselves. Current flowing though any resistance generates noise.

bimasta, 
I use substantially simpler and cheaper solution which is high output cartridges. No need for neither head amp or SUT. 
Direct to phono preamp works best.

"An SUT (Some call them Head Amps) are needed if your phono stage doesn't have enough gain to deal with a low output cartridge."

This may be pedantic, mb1, but I think SUT is specifically a passive step-up using transformers (hence the "T" in SUT), while a head-amp uses active electronics to boost the signal; it needs a power supply, an SUT doesn't.

Their merits are debated. SUTs are 'pure' — head-amps add distortion.
But SUTs pick up hum — head amps don't. But head-amps are noisy — SUTs are dead-silent. Some head-amps use batteries to solve the noise issue. My head-amp plugs into the wall, but I improvised a battery supply (easy, it only needs 12V). Frankly, I hear no difference, no noise either way — but I learned long ago my ears aren't golden... and turning 70 didn't improve them.

I have both SUT and head-amp. I usually decide which to use depending on cartridge, trial and error to see which match I prefer.

But I have a new principle — I use my head-amp when using a passive line preamp to drive my power amp, because passives can lack dynamics and 'flatten' the music — the head-amp, being active, restores dynamics: I can clearly hear more rhythmic drive and sonic contrasts.

But when using a normal active line preamp, I use the SUT, because I'm not lacking dynamics. I get the SUT's purity, without the trade-offs.

Maybe just my latest meaningless fad, but so far seems to work for me.

Another virtue of head-amps is they usually offer more adjustments (impedance, even capacitance) than SUTs, to cater to different LOMCs' requirements.

Hope this makes sense...

Thank you all. It seems to be sounding fine through the PJ.

you have 60 db's of gain with the box.

Use that and you can pay the load by ear, besides the recommended setting.

You may just have to use more of the volume knob for desired 
loudness.

40 ohms load. You should go for a SUT. There is an interesting thread regarding the usage of SUTS or not on Agon.

I used mine with a Bob's Devices Cinemag 3440A SUT into my phono input and it sounded great.  The sound had more authority and detail through the SUT.  I believe the Denon is a 30 or 40 ohm load.

tube box most-likely won't be enough and you may need sut.

Yes. You will have to set the "jumpers" for MC and to select the required load resistance. Read the owners manual.