Has anyone compared Synergistic XOT and XOT Carbon transducers?


I been using the older model XOT a few years now and I'm wondering if the newer Carbon XOT is any better. I found the XOT has a minor improvement on the upper range especially when it comes to female voices. 
128x128ronrags
I upgraded to the XOT Carbon soon after it came out. On my Magico Q3s the XOTs bring a more natural and open sound. The Carbon brought a little more of the same. If you like what the XOT does then try the carbon after all it has a 30 day money back guarantee

The XOT carbon has more of everything that the original XOT brought. More detail, dynamics etc.

But be careful when used with tube amps, I think they change the impedance and were not good with my tube amps..

ozzy

Ozzy,

I haven't had any problems with the original XOT with my Primaluna Int amp so hopefully I won't with the newer model. Thanks
I called the dealer where I purchased the original XOT and he didn't think it was worth the upgrade which I found surprising. He wanted to know my current equipment and thought it might make a very small improvement since the older model pretty much does the same type of noise filtering. I appreciate his honesty and opinion but I guess like any tweaks it comes down to the quality and the synergy with the equipment.

I did upgrade from the older XOT to the newer carbon and there was a slight increase in sound for the better.  Not huge just sightly noticeable.
Pete, looks like your results are exactly what the dealer stated. I also called Synergistic and they suggested I try the Migs 2.0 in lieu of upgrading to the newer carbon XOT. So I received the Migs today and plan to do an extensive review with various genres of music and types of recordings.

I wonder how my new $125 Music Purifiers compare to the latest XOT Carbon? The first suitable person that has an XOT Carbon and contacts me through my website email will get a pair to keep free if they compare and comment. tweakaudio dot com......