1. Home
  2. misc-audio
  3. 1194635038

Reused Item Photos. Misleading?

I noticed today that there are two Ruby 3 carts for sale from different buyers. Each uses the same photographs to seemingly represent the condition and packaging of the item for sale. I think it is misleading practice unless disclosed as a representitive photo of a similer item.

How do members feel about this practice?
eddaytona
Post removed 
albertporter's avatar
albertporter
4,949 posts
 
Marty,

You forgot to include "but I digress" somewhere in the middle of your description.

In case you didn't know, that's a sure fire way to show you're a clever writer.
bearotti
165 posts
 
That was funny Viridian!

Ben
20_20
9 posts
 
in this case, it seems like they're the same cartridge. looks like someone bought it and decided to sell it and used the pics from the previous seller.

i agree the pics in the ads should be of the actual item or disclose otherwise.
mrjstark
1,112 posts
 
Viridian- You are on my black list.
$##&%$*!#@ like you - are the ones that screw-up this
whole exp.
Good luck on your next sell.....????
Mariusz Stark
More to discover