2. misc-audio
  3. 1142006465

McIntosh

I'm just curious and I don't think I've ever seen this question asked. I've owned McIntosh equipment for over 20 years and yet I've never seen any discussion as to owners having modifications made to their equipment as is so often the case with other brands. Is the reason because the equipment is so good it doesn't need to be modified, it isn't engineered in a manner which is conducive to modification, it isn't considered "worthy" of modification? I know McIntosh seems to be more polarizing than a lot of other brands so it seems like an interesting topic.
corbin1
theo's avatar
theo
2,659 posts
 
I agree with Porsiob, as a Mc owner I would almost feel as I commited a sacrilidge if I were to make any changes. I would rather trade to another brand before making any mods.
jaybo
4,478 posts
 
since they are indeed made in a laboratory, i suppose it would be like tinkering with aspirin.
hgeifman
2,110 posts
 
The only McIntosh mod I am aware of is Richard Modafferi. He is an independent consultant to Audio Classics and has agreed to do repairs, modifications and updates for customers of Audio Classics. Richard was a Senior Engineer at McIntosh Laboratories from 1968-74 and he designed the MR77 and MR78 tuners and the famous "Rimo" filter. Please see http://www.audioclassics.com/mods.php3 for a complete description of the Modafferi mods.
stereomaniac
75 posts
 
One reason not to mod McIntosh is to preserve value and collectability on their vintage stuff. 50/50 chance of screwing it up depending on who does the work.
philjolet's avatar
philjolet
2,305 posts
 
their stuff has a high resale value and might actually loose value if modded IMO
More to discover