2. pc-audio
  3. 1282876378

What is the reality of USB and High Sampling Rates

Here is some information that I found on a Website. Thought that I would share it:
THE WELL TEMPERED COMPUTER
An Introduction to Computer Audio
USB Audio Devices can use USB 1 or USB 2 but all conform to the USB Audio Class 1 specs. USB Audio Class 1 supports resolutions up to 24 bits/96 kHz. All operating Systems (Win,OSX,Linux) support USB Audio Class 1 natively. Alot of USB DAC's are limited to 16 bit 32/44.1/48 kHz. This is obviously not a limitation of the USB Audio Class 1 Driver but a matter of a cheap Hardware solution. The more expensive models support the full Audio Class 1 Standard. Very few support the Sample Rates 176 and 192kHz because this requires the development of a custom USB Audio Driver. The Final Specs. for USB Audio 2.0 were released early (2009). USB Audio Class 2 now supports 176 and 192 kHz. At this moment (August 2010) USB Audio 2 is available in OSX 10.6.4 and Linux. It is unclear if Microsoft is going to support USB Audio 2.
Not my words guys. Any comments?
pettyofficer
ballan
184 posts
 
You are really focused on USB audio. It's evolving fast. Digital music is on the move. ;)
4est
507 posts
 
What's the problem with using drivers? Presently some of the best USB and Firewire solutions use them.
pettyofficer OP
462 posts
 
I will take a stab at this 4est. It is not an opinion I share by the way, because I am pretty much ignorant of PC Audio. I will keep on trying to learn. I think that what the Website was saying is that there is nothing wrong with USB,USB 2.0, or USB Class 1 or 2 Drivers and Digital Audio. The point was that it was the implementation (or lack thereof) of Manufacturers for USB Converters/USB Input DAC's to develop the proper Drivers for their Devices. Lower Sampling Rates mean cheaper manufacturing costs for cheaper Drivers, USB and its associated Standards for required Drivers are not the limiting factor. I may be inexperienced, but I know of atleast one High End Manufacturer using the limitations of USB as an excuse for the low Sampling Rate of their USB Input on their DAC. It even includes a 24/196 DAC with 24/96 upsampling. The other Digital Inputs, SPDIF-AES/EBU, can handle the higher Sampling Rates. Only their USB Input can only handle 16/44.1. They blame it on the limitations of USB.
I don't know who is telling the truth. I would like to hear some Input as to which one it is. I just know that it can't be both.
More to discover