Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved


Unable to respond to, "Mach2Music and Amarra: Huge Disappointment"- Thread. Other Members take free pop-shots!
Apparently some have more Freedom Of Speech than others! I
don't know how many times I have said it, I want Computer
Audio to succeed! It will only succeed if Computers are designed from the ground up to reproduce Music (Same minimum standard applied for Equipment of ALL Audio Formats)! This is common sense Audio Engineering Design. Bandaid Modifications cannot be substituted for absence in design to produce Music! Design it right to EARN the right to become a New Audio Format- same as all other Audio Formats! No Freebee's, No Cutting Corners! Lack of design is what's causing such varied results in S.Q. between
listeners of Computer Audio. I see about 50% negative
responses here on these Threads. It will continue to happen unless you fix it! Blaming me won't help! I am an
Engineer, and I can read results! 50/50 success/ failure
rate- you have an inherit Engineering Design Flaw for the
reproduction of Music via Computers! Shock! Suprise- since
they were never designed for Music! So when is someone finally going to properly design the Equipment/Computer
(From the ground up) for Computer Audio? Do we continue
to treat any real criticism as "HERESY" in the lack of
design in Computer Audio for Music? You tell me what I am
allowed to talk about, and we will both know!
pettyofficer
"And to think, all this time I thought it was George Bush's fault !!!!!"

Well, I do blame him (the younger) for a lot but I doubt he even knew what a bit is.

Maybe Petty could have educated him.
PO,

Sorry for that.

I truly enjoy your diatribes. You're like the cranky old grandfather that I never had.
PO,

Wow. Where do I start? Personally I am shocked that you don't get the idea that:-

1. No matter what sample rates become available they will be downloadable to you and all negating the need for alsorts of dead end mediums.

2. Nothing, not even I (the puppet master i believe you named me) can stop progression. If higher sample rates become available that is good. I cannot wait.

3. I don't wish to rob anyone of the chance of having better. In fact it was I that was trying to help you see what is available, and assure you that your computer is a key to any future format. As whatever that format is, it will be data files to be read by software. This is good. You won't need many different machines costing lots of money to play back music. You computer will be your "transport" for any format.

4. Cattle...the only thing I can associate with cattle is the smell that emanates in your confused mutterings.

5. luckily I'm interested in cars and their history so I know vaguely who Ralph Nader is. And here you are correct as I am not him. The question is who are you?
Good question.

Who exactly is my grumpy old grandfather figure PettyOfficer?

Not Ernst Stavro Blofeld

or Dr. Evil I hope!

A good guy I hope. Mr. Bond perhaps?

Maybe the Bond girls are fewer and far between these days accounting for the grumpiness.