2. speakers
  3. 1084720902

Is high frequency extension important to openness

I have noticed that speakers with exceptional tweeters to an excellent job of separating both the sections and individual instruments in an orchestra.
For example: the Mirage 490s, a $600.00 speaker, are terrific at delineating individual instruments on CD, even with as modest a system as an Arcam Alpha 7, Transparent Music Wave cabling, MIT CVT Termintor interconnects, and a JVC XL Z-1050TN CD player. In fact, the level of openness in the high frequencies give the impression of being on a catwalk peering down into the orchestra and being able to hear individual instruments "sitting" near each other.
In contrast, a considerably more high end system, say, a Marsh A400s, with Alon speakers and speaker cabling, Philips/Arcam CD player and Nordost interconnects don't show the "individuality" as well. And the room is quite well treated, thanks (for those suggesting it's room acoustics) and speaker placement is good.
Why is this so? The Mirage tweeter is an older design, but HP once averred the Mirage tweeter (a bigger model,but same line) was superb. Shouldn't a $3-5,000 speaker have better separation than a 12-year old $600.00 speaker?! And of course, I realize that technology is no guarantee of progress, but intellectually I'm curious as to what others think.
What thoughts do you have that would explain this? What speaker below $5,000 are adept at this separation? And is it simply the tweeter or is it the entire design of the speaker?
mphnkns
gregm
3,395 posts
 
Yes it is -- but then again, bass notes also help sculpt the "space" (in combination with the upper register). This of course applies in the ideal world where phase is not a problem at all, cabinets do not contribute their own sound, and drivers have very strong magnets & strong cones and minimal moving mass; the drivers are matched with excellent, lossless crossovers that are not affected by coil temperature /impedance changes.
In the real world, it takes more than a 120kHz tweet to reproduce a flawless sense of space :(
Ultimately, if you stumble upon a speaker you really like, you're lucky!
warrenh's avatar
warrenh
2,299 posts
 
I cannot explain the separation thing, but I can say, that my Harmonic Precision Caravelles, are the most phase coherent, airy, beautifully extended (highs and lows), bass to die for(in a 7" woofer), in a monitor, with an amazing patent pending crossover, that I've ever heard. Whew! You can read my review in the archives about these babies. Really, quite phenominal for the size and price. peace, warren
newbee
4,751 posts
 
IMHO, ultra high frequency extension, in itself, is important only to dogs! Its about clarity of tone (call it resolution if you like) and this depends on the quality of the cross over, the driver, the enclosure and the synergy between them. Except for real bass I think you will find that several manufacturers have done a pretty good job of putting this together, GMA comes instantly to mind. In the $3 to 5000 market there are many that do the job very well, including bass. I think you need to get out a bit and actually listen to whats available, your examples suggest that you've been reading too much. :-)
audiokinesis
2,716 posts
 
It may be argued that wide dispersion at high frequencies is just as important as extension, if the goal is openness and airiness. Reverberant energy contributes to the sense of ambience and acoustic space, and a wide-pattern tweeter will give you more reveberant energy in the upper treble region. Unfortunately there's a possible tradeoff involved: all else being equal, the imaging may not be as precise because a wide-pattern tweeter will put more energy into the early reflections.
More to discover