Why vinyl?


I understand the thoughts of a lot of you that digital is harsh and bright and has an edge. I know that analog has a warmer fuller sound, otherwise why would so many people put up with the inconvenience of records, cartridges, cleaners, tone-arm adjustments, etc. I used to be there. Of course all I had was a Garrard direct drive turntable. If the idea is to get as close as possible to the original source, why has not open-reel tape made a huge comeback. After all that's how most of the stuff was recorded in the first place. Very few were direct to disk recordings. Why would dragging a stylus through a groove be better than the original? There used to be a company out there called In-Synch that used the original masters and sold cassettes of them, dubbed at 1:1 ratio. I was the happiest person in the world when CD's came out and I could throw out my disk-washer and everything else that went with it, including the surface noise and the TICKS and POPS. Just something I've wondered about.
elmuncy
Well spoken from there downunder! HEAR-HEAR!
PS: You forgot to add the Goldmund Reference to your list of analog gear which is exceptional. Cheers,
Hello Detlof, good to see you again along these shores. Of course one must mention the Goldmund -- can my trusted 13yrs old S. Yorke TT get a mention too? It held its own against a Burmester 979/980 (what's more, at a Burmester dealer's! OK, so he too is a vinyl man)
POPS and CRACKS ?? I HEAR NOTHING BUT MUSIC FROM MY BLACK AND BIG 12 INCH CD'S.
As many may already know there's a nice web page out there entitled just this - Why Vinyl?

For analog experts, it might only be of peripheral interest - as a non-expert, indeed beginner, I found it helpful and informative.