Am I an Audiophile?


This may seem like a subject meant only for mental calisthenics and one which has probably been addressed many times but here goes.

A couple of weeks ago a guy referred to my system as not being of audiophile quality. This didn't bother me partly because I never presumed to call myself an audiophile and, after I thought about it, I am not sure what it means anyway.

I looked up the definition and the main reference was to using "high end" equipment to accomplish high quality sound reproduction. High end, I suppose, refers to the monetary investment that one is willing/able to make putting a system together. This "wow, you spent that much? It must sound great" approach to hi fi can't be valid even though, if you know what you're doing, having a relatively unrestricted budget has to help a lot. Another judgement is that if one doesn't incorporate vacuum tubes to play vinyl recordings one can't call themselves an audiophile.

I have what would most likely be considered by most as mid fi at best. It doesn't in any way, though, restrict my enjoyment and appreciation of well recorded music. Nor does it qualify me as any kind of expert as regards the choices I've made to get to this level.

If appreciation of quality sound reproduction is the primary qualification for audiophile classification then I suppose I would qualify. In that case, one could be called one even if they owned no sound equipment themselves I suppose.

I have devoted a great deal of time and effort through the years on Hi Fi usually on a fairly tight budget. I built my first Heathkit monaural amplifier when I was 15 years old. That was over 55 years ago. For that first setup I also built a "sweet sixteen" speaker enclosure consisting of 16 modified 4" drivers that I read about in Popular Electronics. I also used my parent's attic as an infinite baffle using a cheap 12" driver.

I have put together many systems since the advent of stereo with an emphasis on panels (ribbons and ESL's) with Japanese and British amps. Currently, my system is: Shanling s-100 solid state CD player, CAL tube DAC, Rogue Audio Sphinx integrated hybrid amplifier and ML Odyssey speakers which I've owned for 14 or 15 years. Although there are some changes that I could make, to me, it sounds great and I think that is all I need to make me happy. BTW, someone should write a treatise based on Jeff Foxworthy's "you might be a redneck if....." You might be an audiophile if you spent more on your stereo than on your car (or house), etc, etc.

Anyway, I kind of look at this the same as defining someone as an intellectual in that the term doesn't necessarily imply exceptional intelligence but the devotion to studying and thinking about things in a more than passing way.

So, although I would not presume to refer to myself as an audiophile, I've at least applied my best efforts toward that imaginary goal.
128x128broadstone
The rich and the jealous will always find an excuse or context in which to separate themselves from others.

As you've come to realize, enjoying music the way you do can have many names, many labels, but in the end, it doesn't matter what you or others call it, unless having a reference or sorts helps.

There are times when I consider myself an audiophile and times when I don't, depending on the context, my state of mind, the alignment of the universe.
Enjoy.

All the best,
Nonoise
The very word 'audiophile' is suggestive of apparatus. I love the gear, but only as much as it is able to represent what it's made for,...the music. Therein lies that very fine line which separates those who care more about the gear vs. those who care more about the music. When it comes to music, caring more about the gear seems too shallow a position to aspire to. However, I'm ready to change it if and when it's found to be lacking. I suppose in the end it's irrelevant which you care more about as it relates to the formal definition. An audiophile can't have one without the other.
If you dream about equipment, Vinyl and/or Digital music purchases you are there regardless of what you own. It is a slippery slop. WELCOME
why is a term so important ?

whether one is or is not an audiophile has no relevance to the enjoyment of music, which should be of primary importance.

if one is "hung up" by the term and is concerned whether it is applicable to him/her, it seems to me to be indicative of insecurity.

terms used by so-called audiophiles are unimportant. what is important is enjoying ;istening to your stereo system.
It isn't. It's about non audiophiles getting the wrong impression; that I'm hung up on the equipment when I'm not. The first system with separate components I have experience with is a mediocre all Yamaha set-up back in '71 by my then brother-in-law that I remember saying was the best sound I've ever heard. It was with an NS series pair of speakers, the catalyst that introduced me. Okay, I see where this is going. I'm not in love!!, I'm not. Seriously:)