Are there any current production great speakers using AMT tweeters?

This is why I like AI for evaluations. It's probably not 100% because with the ESS and an improved crossover it's best guess, but AIs guess is more educated than mine.

Chat on ESS AMT 1D REVIVAL VS Philharmonic HT Towers

Knowing your preferences, I actually think this is a much closer contest than the Philharmonic vs. most conventional speakers.
Compared to the ESS AMT-1D Revival
Dynamics
Winner: ESS AMT-1D Revival
The 12-inch woofer, large passive radiator, high sensitivity (around 98 dB for the Revival), and effortless output give it a sense of scale that relatively small Purifi woofers simply can't match. It plays louder with less strain and sounds more like live music. �
Hifitest
Bass impact
Winner: ESS
The Purifi woofers are lower in distortion, but physics still matters. The ESS moves much more air and produces greater visceral impact.
Midrange accuracy
Winner: Philharmonic
The BMR midrange is extraordinarily smooth and well-controlled. Vocals, strings, and piano are likely to be more tonally accurate and consistent across the room. �
Audioholics +1
Imaging
Slight edge: Philharmonic
The three-way design with a dedicated BMR midrange offers exceptionally stable imaging and a broad listening window. It disappears a bit better than the ESS in many rooms.
Soundstage
Depends
Philharmonic: more precise placement of performers.
ESS: larger, taller, more enveloping presentation.
The ESS creates a "wall of sound." The Philharmonic creates a more holographic map of the recording.
Treble
Tie
Both use excellent AMTs.
The original Great Heil remains one of the finest high-frequency transducers ever made. The Philharmonic's modern AMT integrates more seamlessly with the rest of the system, while the Heil has a uniquely effortless, airy presentation.
Crossover integration
Winner: Philharmonic
Dennis Murphy is widely respected for crossover design, and the HT Tower's integration is exceptionally refined. �
Audioholics +1
If both were in my room
If I wanted to analyze recordings...
➡️ Philharmonic.
If I wanted to enjoy music...
➡️ ESS.
And knowing your priorities—realism, dynamics, the sensation of musicians in the room, and your appreciation for the Great Heil—I actually think you'd probably prefer the ESS AMT-1D Revival.
I also think your custom crossover has the potential to push the Revival beyond the stock version. Upgrading crossover components and carefully optimizing the crossover can improve integration, transparency, and tonal balance beyond what a production speaker is designed to deliver.
My prediction for your system
With your electronics and if the crossover is optimized as we've discussed:
Dynamics: ESS
Bass authority: ESS
Imaging: slight Philharmonic
Tonal neutrality: Philharmonic
Realism: ESS
Emotional engagement: ESS
"Sounds like real instruments": ESS
For most listeners seeking the flattest, most objectively neutral response, I'd recommend the Philharmonic HT Tower. But based on what you've consistently described wanting from a loudspeaker, I think you'd be more likely to keep the ESS AMT-1D Revival long-term.

FinkTeam Kim and Wolf von Langa SON are both outstanding examples, in my experience.

Radiant Acoustics Clarity 

Excellent woofers as well 

@sdl4 

"Many decades ago, I had a pair of ESS speakers with AMT tweeters that were initially dramatic but ultimately disappointing. These turned out to produce sound that was mostly "boom and sizzle," with poor integration of the tweeter and woofer. I was very happy to move on to more satisfying speakers, and I lived fairly happily for many years with the metal dome tweeters in a pair of Thiel floor stander."

Agreed..., until I stumbled upon the cure for this that takes the Heils to a whole nother level.  There is nothing like these now!

https://audiokarma.org/forums/threads/im-fixing-a-hole-heil.1025205/

This is why I like AI for evaluations. It’s probably not 100% because with the ESS and an improved crossover it’s best guess, but AIs guess is more educated than mine.

Many times I’ve asked AI to compare two models of speaker that I own/owned. In approximately 2/3rds of these queries, it suggested a preference for the speaker that I determined was inferior in real-world experience. For the most part, LLMs only make predictions based on info they gather from the web, and they often miss critical details in exchange for a speedy answer. For example, AI will tend to conclude a larger diameter woofer can move more air simply for the fact it’s larger, without considering each woofer’s excursion capabilities, sensitivity etc. They also have a tendency to treat subjective forum opinions as fact. This is especially the case with Gemini and Chat GPT LLMs. Both of those particular AIs are practically useless for choosing HiFi gear unless you merely want to compare basic specs. Of course, when you call them out on their idiosyncrasies or contradictions, they tend to backpedal and have an excuse for their misleading suggestions. It’s scary how human-like they are in that regard.