Subwoofers - crazy upgrade!

Move the subs out of the corner and try something like this..

Rather than stacking, you can also get a in-wall sub for either sub 3 or sub 4..and mount it in the ceiling at the same lengthwise/widthwise location in image above. Ideally, you would want sub 3 at 1/4 height and sub 4 at 3/4th height and so on.. The idea is to remove some heightwise nulls by mounting a sub at ceiling height...If you stack expensive subs all the way to the ceiling, your wallet might lose some of its rotundness.

@ozzy  wrote

I have 4 subs, placed in the corners of the room. But I wonder if stacking 2 in the front would be better?

Anyone have an opinion on this? They are heavy, so to stack might be difficult for me.

ozzy

@ozzy 

You should be ok with 4 subs. Apply some DSP and add some acoustic panels if you want to maximize them. 
 

@gdaddy1 

Staking your subs doesn’t really improve bass quality. You are basically exciting the same mode. You might get more volume but you lose on quality. Only one listener will benefit from the additional volume. 
This video might help:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McN2AygDMtQ

I added two Rhythmik F12se subs to my system and have had much the same experience.  Much better base qualitatively, but it also had an impact on the overall sound.

@spenav  It's NOT about more volume. You missed the point. It is about better quality, highed fidelity bass.

If you're setting up a home theater then spreading the subs around the space would help to get more even bass at different seat locations.

However for audiophile music listening stacked subs are far better. Try a visit to the REL show room and take a listen or go to PS Audio and look at their double stack or look at SVS stacked subs. (which is what Ozzy could have)

No where in that video does he say anything about stacking subs or losing quality of the sound. It's all home theater stuff and irrelevant to what I said.

I was also blown away when I added my 2 Rel subs. Just crazy.