CAT6 vs CAT6a
@daveyf I wouldn’t tax myself too hard.
The price per 1000 ft reel difference is in the couple of hundred bucks region. The performance is also primarily to do with speed over distance, not absolute speed.
- CAT5e = 100 MHz signal 1Gbps over 100 metres / 320 ft;
- CAT6 = 250 MHz signal 10Gbps up to 55 metres / 180 ft;
- CAT6a = 500 MHz signal 10Gbps up to 100 metres / 320 ft.
For me, this makes CAT6 a worthwhile leap, with 6a worth it if I am using runs approaching the 3/4 of the limit for CAT6.
-
Should you plump for CAT6a anyway because the cost differential is small... well perhaps, but higher frequency signals are more susceptible to EMI... but then the cable construction is better... but, but, but... It’s another hifi rabbit hole that you can drive yourself crazy in whilst pursuing tiny improvements.
I am a horrible pragmatist. If I had a known EMI problem I would work with CAT6. If my cable runs were long I would use CAT6a. Otherwise whatever reel I could get my hands on most conveniently would probably dictate my choice. Others will likely be more professional about this decision.
-
What you can be sure about is that CAT7 and higher cables are not worth pursuing yet.
CAT7 cable is fast, but it requires a proprietary connector. The problem is that the whole world is still using RJ45 sockets on almost everything. Predictably, sellers attach RJ45 plugs or sockets to these fast cables, but they are not 600Mhz compatible, so the plug / socket throttles the cable.
There’s a lot of marketing BS in networking... bit like HiFi :) Very often, less is more.

