Yesterday at 12:48, OP, having against all evidence convinced himself he had a real Siltech cable, wrote:
I plugged the siltech into my wells audio commander pre. I knew immediately this was the spot for it. The cable opened up and all the resolution and solidity of imaging was there. A little soft due to not being a cryo cable but had all the lack of distortion and detail a cryo cable usually brings. Sometimes a silver cable this soft can be fuzzy around the edges but not here.
By 8:57 pm, it had dawned on him that his cable was a fake and he now had this to say about it:
Not sure if because one end has a slight kink in it or what but there’s distortion or something coming through that is hurting my ears. Best part of the cable is the fullness of mids and good bass. But not a huge fan of the timbres or the smaller side imaging
I don’t doubt OP’s good faith (unlike TMR’s, mind you), but the fact that a mere difference in OP’s state of mind could produce such diametrically opposed listening reports while everything else was the same - gear, room, listener, listener’s ears, and the cable itself - is evidence of the general worthlessness of audiophile’s professed opinions when it comes to minor components whose capacity to influence sound quality is dubious in the first place.

