I tried to be nice to you.
What’s all this drivel? Ramblings without staying on topic.
Very unconvincing. I showed my Son this post you wrote about me and he said you must be high on drugs.
@frank009 has never done that. He just bashes what he envies, trying to convince himself that he is not missing out. Along the way, he will pick up a cable denier straggler or two, and that makes him feel a little better, but still he remains envious.
I am basing my conclusion on @frank009 never writing that he did any cable swaps, with quality cables (the ones he is bashing), on a revealing stereo. He harps on science, science, and science, and he is not a scientist. I doubt that he has ever heard a revealing stereo.
And science cannot measure all audio gear’s sonic properties, today. Decades from now, perhaps. But not today.
And any real scientist will put her findings into practice. In the case of cables, she would use her ears. But not @frank009. He tells us that we should believe his scientific claims, and ignore what we hear. His computers work fine with standard cables, so stereos will not benefit from better quality cables, based on him never testing his assertions.
You don’t know me in person. If you did, you may learn how to write a more cohesive case against someone, attacking their knowledge and credibility. I find your arguments to be exceptionally weak and irrational. Sorry, just stating it like it is.

