Does anyone have a digital system that is as involving as their analogue front end?

MONTHS 1-6: I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! MONTHS 6-12: OKAY, MAYBE THE BASS IS A BIT WOOLY, BUT STILL LOVE IT! YEAR TWO: YUP, THE HORNS AREN'T EXACTLY RIGHT, I MEAN ESPECIALLY AFTER I READ THAT REVIEW ON THOSE HORN SPEAKERS. YEAR 3: I HAVE GOT TO GET HORN SPEAKERS. I MADE A BIG MISTAKE BY NOT BUYING THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. YEAR FOUR: HONEY, TECHNOLOGY HAS REALLY CAUGHT UP WITH THESE OLD SPEAKERS. FOR A MERE $195,000 I CAN GET SPEAKERS SO GOOD I'LL NEVER NEED ANYTHING NEW AGAIN. AND WE CAN TIGHTEN OUR BELTS BY NOT HAVING THAT SECOND KID. AND YOU CAN WAIT FIVE YEARS FOR A NEW CAR. 

My digital side sounds excellent,  no complaints.   Aurender N200, Teac 701t and Lab 12 DAC 1 Ref.    

I just upgraded my Sota to a new Sota with a Dynavector XX2 mkII and now it's hard NOT to want to listen to vinyl.   I should have spent $$$ on a great cartridge a long time ago.   

As I listen and compare my analog /digital chain I think it's clear to me that you are actually preferring the way the hardware "sounds" than the source with LPs.  If that makes sense.   That plus the mastering may make one lean toward vinyl. 

Either way I enjoy and use all formats. 

@oddiofyl 

I have also graduated to the $2k range of cartridges and they do sound a lot better. I have read reviews saying anything above that and your paying for a certain type of sound rather than something that simply opens up to all ranges of sound without bias. If that is possible.

I think whenever audiophiles get a new piece of equipment (like a cartridge), we listen to that more for a while and then settle down to listening to music and enjoying it. Congrats on your system.

Keith Jarrett would likely tell you that no digital setup is as good as analogue/vinyl. But what does HE know?😆

I enjoy digital. I have a DCS digital system, and also my trusty Arcam FMJ CD 23(!) which can equal my vinyl in some ways, but not as closely as the sound I hear in the symphony halls I frequent.

Digital is still like listening to music behind a force field  (the music doesn't move towards you as fluidly as it does in real life), while vinyl does that more easily.

But I'm using classical music as the benchmark, not pop or rock (which, frankly, are often recorded poorly, especially beginning in the 1980s). On a well-recorded classical album from, say, 1964 (Mercurys, Deccas, London), the sound is closer to say, Carnegie Hall, or Boston Symphony Hall.

I’ve just added a couple of additional linear power supplies for peripheral equipment that have taken away a little more of the digital glare. It feels tantalisingly close to being as involving as vinyl, but is still not there yet. I need to focus when listening to digital to maintain the illusion, whereas vinyl feels effortless.

There’s just one more power supply to change, but after that I’ve run out of tweaks. Then any further digital improvement will come at a cost, say replacing the Roon NUC with a Melco or whatever. Alternatively, I could at look less ruthlessly revealing loudspeakers.

Maybe, I should just accept that digital is for exploring new music and vinyl is my main format. I shall mull this over while my turntable is out of action.