Acoustic Panel Room Treatments : Built-in vs surface mount question

@kevinzoe thank you; that’s highly responsive to my question and raises a point i had not considered, which is the lack of flexibility for future adjustments that is inherent in built-in absorption.  Obviously, one would do a lot of professionally guided measuring and modeling before installation, but what happens if one changes speaker make or location (or maybe even furniture layout) later?  

All really useful stuff.  We’re no where close to embarking on another renovation, but I can see, when we are, there will be a lot of questions for a professional consultant and installer to think about and we will need to leave time for some trial and error before doing anything quasi-permanent.  

Given the room limitations in the next room on the renovation list (e.g. floor to ceiling windows on the east and south side and no wall at all on the west side), we may just have to live with some ceiling mounted treatments and work on finding the balance between maximum performance and minimum aesthetic harm.

@kirkwallace 

I had exactly the panels you described in my Family Room, until my unusually clumsy Sister-In-Law, destroyed three out of four.  I have since replaced all four panels with a 2” thick insulation foam (MUCH CHEAPER!) There is a small, but noticeable difference in the sound, but it gives my S-I-L more room to wobble through the room.  I also have a fully carpeted, padded floor, some cheap 2’x4’ foam panels that I’m playing with.  I have them on 7’ tall frames so I can move them around to see if I might want more absorption behind me. About half of my current room is open to other rooms, so there’s not much more I can really do for now.

My wife has been talking about moving, so doing much more would be a waste of time and money.

Only if she plans to let you come with her, @curiousjim 😂

@kirkwallace 

Good Point! 🤣