Should AI generated posts be banned or otherwise regulated?

I aslo have pretty loud tinnitus, which I attribute to both age and exposure to a great deal of artillery and mortar fire and small arms fire while serving as a junior Infantry officer with the 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) in Vietnam; I must have an air cleaner running on high at night to mask the ringing in my head, which is at about 1200 hz.  However, my Fyne Audio F-702 speakers do a superb job of reproducing music, so much so that I seldom notice the tinnitus while playing most music--classical , Big Band, and soft rock, such as the Moody Blues, Beach Boys, CCR, and vocalists.

As for banning AI, I would vote "No."  It would be nice, however, if whenever someone posted AI-generated material they would identify it as such.

@audiokinesis 

Yep, that is exactly the kind of question that AI tends to get very wrong. It is really good at generalizations... and bad at detailed specifics. 

The more you use AI, specifically ChatGPT in my experience, the more you’ll find its answers to be long winded and not what you asked, sychophantic, blatantly wrong, and completely made up.

Example: I asked it to compare the Rogue RP-5 to the Rogue RP-1 deriving its answer from actual user experiences. Except I typo’ed and wrote RP-11.

It told me through real user experience, they found the RP-11 to be more refined and musical than the RP-5, with a blacker background and cleaner sound. For those who don’t know, there is no RP-11. This is just a quick audio example of its nonsense. I’ve myriad more unrelated examples.

Forgot contradictory!

@thecarpathian 

  that’s funny because I had typed the exact same query into Chat GPT a few months ago, minus the typo.  I just rechecked the answer and it is essentially the same as yours