Audiophile Equipment


I learned the value of audiophile equipment early in my pursuit of the high end. I had accumulated enough gear for a system and was looking for the best possible tape deck… with Dolby C. From the popular magazines… Stereo ReviewStereo Times… the Harman Kardon T392 seemed to represent the pinnacle. So I bought one. It was OK… but such a huge step down from vinyl that I was genuinely bummed, especially since it cost something like $650… a lot of money at the time.

A few months later I was browsing a high-end audio shop and, somewhat morosely, told my story to a salesman. He just started laughing. “Those things are junk… you need a real tape deck.” He led me over to the window, where there was a seven-year-old used Nakamichi 1000… huge, with wood paneling all around it… looking more like a reel-to-reel than a cassette deck. He wanted $1,200 for it. That was an astronomical amount of money… and it was old. Then he said, “Take it home… try it.”

My first real jaw-drop moment.

It had the full depth and bass of vinyl… it was simply astonishing. It made the so-called “flagship” Harman Kardon sound like a cheap plastic transistor radio and without Dolby C.  All that glossy magazine talk about bandwidth and specs… page after page of marketing… well, that’s all it was. This old, purpose-built audiophile machine performed leagues above the consumer-level product.

I was hooked.

It wasn’t my last audiophile purchase… but it was my last consumer-level purchase for decades.

ghdprentice

Dear @decooney @llg98ljk  : Very good experience you had.

Till today I never read to any one post that in any way diminish those top of the line Nakamichi tape decks, even today still are great mahines.

 

ADS is almost the same on speakers almost any model.

R.

@rauliruegas 

My first speakers were ADS 420s which I really enjoyed. I long lusted after 810s or 910s. And then along came the 2030s.  I was sad to see the demise of the brand before I had the means. Fabulous stuff.

Back in the late 70s, in addition to ADS monitors and sub, my dad purchased their digital delay system which incorporated two rear speakers powered by a small amp that had a variable delay to recreate the ambiance and reverberation of a hall. While it allowed the user to overdo it, set up well it did a reasonable job of recreating a hall - most effective for chamber music or jazz.  Pretty innovative stuff - but it was always the speakers I admired most.  

Regards,

I still use my 1980s Nak cassette decks.  If you have them calibrated for the specific tapes you record on, the fidelity is amazing.  Like other Nak owners, I taped my LPs and listened more often to the tapes than the LPs.  And I made many mix tapes that I still enjoy.  I'm making one now of live Santana, taking the best selections from several albums--some on LP, some streamed.  

I love the medium of tape! I still listen to q8 tapes on my quad system and enjoy my Akai GX-646 for reel tapes and Nakamichi LX-5 for cassettes (though it is currently in need of at least one belt - but it is a wonderful deck!). 

I got into high end cassette decks late in life. I like archiving club recordings. Many are on cassette tapes. I was skeptical about the potential quality of the tapes. I bought an almost new Nakamichi Dragon. Wow! Fortunately and apparently most tape decks will record better than they will play back. The Dragon breathed life into some very old and cheap tapes. For whoever isn't aware of the magic of the Dragon; it doesn't depend on the pressure pad when playing a tape. This is great as often the pressure pad has fallen off and used to require a transfer of the tape to another shell. I also have a Revox B215. It matches the Dragon in sound quality. The big plus with the Dragon is the fact stated above. The big downside of the Dragon is the extensive components inside. When I acquired the Revox and looked inside I thought it couldn't come close to the Nak. But it does!