I have two restored Quad amps: a 303 and a 405. Plus two pairs of Quad 57's. I recommend a pair of 57's for your room. Sonically better than the dynamic speakers on your list. The 57's will fit well in your room and have quite adequate SPL levels and satisfactory bass. Despite their age the 57's still rank in the top category and have a "see-through" quality that makes them quite addictive!
Speaker advice for my restored QUAD 33 & 303?
Hello everyone,
I’m currently putting together a vintage system built around a restored Quad 33 preamp and Quad 303 power amplifier, and I’m looking for advice on suitable passive speakers.
Both units have been professionally serviced / refurbished (capacitors replaced and general overhaul), so they are in good electrical condition and performing as intended.
My musical taste is mainly music from the 1970s and similar styles:
pop, rock, disco, some electronic, funk and R&B.
I listen to very little jazz or classical, and virtually no house or hip-hop.
I am a typical hybrid audio listener, so both analog sources (vinyl - Thorens TD-160, compact cassette - Nakamichi 600, reel-to-reel tape - Revox B77 MKII) as digital (streaming services and FLAC from my NAS).
That said, I do occasionally play the typical “audiophile” recordings (digital source) that are often used at hi-fi shows, so I do appreciate clarity and detail as well.
The listening room is not large — approximately 4 x 4 meters (about 16 m² / 170 sq ft).
Listening distance will likely be around 2 to 2.5 meters.
I’m particularly interested in vintage speakers from roughly the same era as the Quad electronics, but I’m open to slightly newer designs if they are known to work well with the Quad 303.
Models I am currently considering include:
- JBL 4311
- JBL 4312A
- KEF 104aB
- Celestion Ditton 44
From what I understand, the Quad 303 has moderate power but very good control, so speakers with reasonable sensitivity and an easy load seem important.
My priorities are:
- engaging and dynamic sound for rock/disco/funk
- good bass control in a relatively small room (I do not like dominant bass)
- long-term listening comfort (not overly aggressive)
- good overall musicality rather than extreme analytical detail
I would really appreciate hearing about real-world experiences with the Quad 33/303 combination.
Specifically:
- Which speakers have you used successfully with a Quad 303?
- What worked well — and what didn’t?
- Are there particular models that you feel are an especially good match for this amplifier in a smaller room?
Thank you in advance for your insights.
- ...
- 4 posts total
The Quad 57s (the obvious choice) play mostly midrange, which they do excellently well, better than the dynamci choices you outlined. Back in the day I also tried Quad 45s -- but the older 57s sounded better to me. I had also tried teh Ditton 44s, but their midrange was no match for the 57s (or the 45s, for that matter). |
Thanks a lot @jasonbourne71 @gregm I have indeed considered the Quad ESL-57. Given my Quad electronics, it feels like a very natural and historically correct match, and I fully understand the reputation these speakers have, especially for midrange transparency. That said, at this stage I see the ESL-57 more as an interesting side path rather than my primary direction. My hesitation is mainly practical and related to my listening preferences and room constraints. From what I understand, the ESL-57 excels in the midrange, but places less emphasis on the extremes of the frequency spectrum — particularly bass impact and overall dynamics — which are aspects that matter to me with the type of music I listen to (mostly ‘70s pop, rock, disco, funk and R&B). In addition, my room is relatively small (about 4 x 4 meters / 16 m²), and placing the speakers well into the room — roughly 1 meter from the front wall — would be challenging from a layout and usability perspective. The physical size and placement sensitivity of the ESL-57 are therefore also considerations for me. So while I have a lot of respect for the ESL-57 and may well explore them someday, for now I’m leaning more toward conventional dynamic speakers that offer a bit more full-range balance and placement flexibility. I would be very interested to hear your thoughts — and those of other members — specifically on the speakers I mentioned earlier: Do any of you have direct experience pairing these models with a Quad 303?
In particular, I’m curious about:
Many thanks again for sharing your experience — this is very helpful.
|
JBL 4425 monitor’s see here! Very dynamic, great imaging and non fatiguing. Mike |
- 4 posts total