USB cable recommendation


I have an Aurender N150 and a Garlubidor Divinity DAC. I'm trying to figure out if my Transparent USB cable is limiting my hardware. I asked AI to make a suggestion, and they recommended a Shunyata Theta, Audioquest Diamond and Audioquest Carbon. Now I guess I'm looking for a human's suggestion.

dpm2340

Audioquest Diamond or Audience Studio One if you want natural and detailed presentation. If you want analytical, Shunyata. 

Digital packets down a digital cable can neither add nor take away a natural tone or provide a more detailed sound neither can a USB cable impart analytical presentation. If you can provide the peer reviewed science, I would gladly read it.

@nubiann provide the evidence that usb cables do not make any difference in sound quality and I will gladly read it. Also please list your system: components, speakers, cables…add some context to your evaluation that you had done with usb cables (list the cables that were evaluated).

audphile1

Predictably Lame distraction and diversion! Why don’t you instead answer the question. My system is not the discussion point here and I really don’t require a critique from you friend.

Also I make no claims related to the superior performance of exepnsive USB cables, that has fallen to you. I just see the USB standard and accept basic requirement that this type of interconnect benefits from proper shielding, mechanical contruction keeping the length as short as possible. In this respect there are many reasonably priced cables that will be a match for these ridiculously priced, prettied esoteric offerings.

I choose whom I share detail with, depending on the level of engagement and open friendly discussion. Sadly that rarely applies to your comments on this forum, as it is quite apparent you prefer to devalue the opinions and views of others rather than engage in discussion.

Following many years working for Sony as a quality Auditor and development Engineer, my current industry is Nutraceuticals and Probiotics and my company correctly relies on peer reviewed published papers to support what we say and do.

I dont think it unreasonable to start calling these companies out, and putting the onus on them to prove what they claim. Some companies USB cable products cost $1000’s, they should front up and actually prove they do do make a difference. Or are they simply milking aspiring audiophiles? I strongly suggest the latter is true.

As far as I can research there are no double blind tests neither is there any supportive product measurement data. Instead there is plenty of meaningless hyerbole that they dont have to justify. Conversely there is quite alot of independent measurement data to support my assertion that their claims are mostly arrant nonesense as many here suspect.

Infact these companies rely on people like you to parrot the advertising blurb, convincing others that they are missing out. For instance, your comments endowing a simple data carrying USB cable with the ability to miraculously extract ’more detail’ from the data, or to be able to make that same packet data somehow be especially ’analytical’ is typical, at best its simple parroting, at worst its simply disingenuous and foolishly misleading.

Many here, despite an industry that is full of BS have saved and navigated a way to putting together systems that work for them and in the process have been persuaded to waste lots of hard earned cash  along the way. I fall into that category but now I ask questions and challenge obvious falsehoods. Its sad that someone who has aquired knowledge chooses to use it so negatively. 

 

@nubiann 

I have no interest in engaging with you on this or any other audio related topic.
I will close this conversation with the following -

1. I listen to my system with my ears. Not with an oscilloscope. 

2. My system is highly resolving, my room is acoustically treated and my ears, thank god, work properly. This allows me to pick out differences, large or small, between components, cables, cartridges, different versions of masters of the same albums on digital and analog

3. Once again, we’re not printing word documents. USB in audio is highly dependent on implementation in both streamer and DAC. It will sound different. 
4. Digital signal that traverses via USB is encapsulated in an anslog signal and is represented as voltage fluctuations. USB is made of some sort of alloy, be it copper or silver, the only method to exchange data is voltage fluctuations.
And as such, USB cable is susceptible to external interference factors such as EMI/RFI as well as variations in conductivity between different grades of coppet, silver, etc. With USB the clock in a receiving device, which in our case is DAC, will be responsible for timing the signal  With noise added to the transmission over copper or silver, will impact the effectiveness and efficiency of the receiver clock. Thus changing the sound quality.

When you have a system that can resolve these differences and you have an ear to pick these changes out, and you stop reading ASR nonsense and actually listen instead of reading that garbage, let me know. For now, take care and enjoy the rest of your weekend.