I’m not a Klipsch apologist in terms of their unorthodox presentation and design; you either love it or hate it. Having said that, I’m wondering if the pairing Klipsch with modern solid state amps designed for different speaker loads might emphasize the worst characteristics of both the speaker and the amp.
About 5 years ago I ran across a pair of 1977 La Scala, all original, in a craigslist ad. It was a “couple approaching retirement age and wife pressuring to get rid of them” situation so I got them for a song. Set up a secondary bedroom system with them for fun.
All I had amp-wise were a pair of massively overpowered Emotiva Differential Reference monoblocks (650W@8 Ohms, 1000W@4) and another pair of Nelson Pass designed Amp Camp Amps (15W@8).
- With the Emotivas, the old La Scalas sounded awful, like the camp PA horns on the show M*A*S*H.
- With the lower power but ‘sweeter’ sounding ACA amps, still solid state, they sounded much better.
Then I picked up a pair of 1950s Quad II amps lovingly refurbished by an actual Zen-practitioner electrical engineer in Colorado. Also 15W@8, but all tube, gorgeous KT66 push-pull Class-A sound. What a difference! Like, I just plopped down on my bed and listened. Couldn’t stop for hours. It was just the most transparent, effortless, zero-fatigue, realistic sound.
Like Nelson Pass is so famously quoted, “It’s the first Watt that matters. All the other Watts that come later don’t mean a thing if the first one isn’t perfect.” I think that’s especially true with high sensitivity horn speakers. They reveal very small differences in amp topology like gain staging and feedback issues that less sensitive speakers mask.
Anyway, I wonder if your negative experience with modern Klipsch could be chalked up to that. They’ll pry these old Quad II amps from my cold, dead hands!

