I have ZERO interest in acquiring a really really good copy of any recording. The actual music and performance are what speak to me.
If I had a "best" copy I would just get sick of it quicker.
But supply and demand, you buy now.
Buy buy.
Better Records White Hot Stampers: Now the Story Can Be Told!
My experience buying from Better Records: Great: customer service. Really top-notch in terms of response time, packaging, mailing, and return policy. Which for the purchase prices, it should be. Mixed Bag: the value propostion. Re. the half dozen titles I bought, 1/2 were modestly better than the good pressings I already had of those albums (ok, that’s something), and 1/2 were about the same (the latter half therefore returned). Given the high costs, I don’t expect to buy from them again (though I wouldn’t rule it out entirely). I’d say if you have particularly deep pockets and not the time or motivation to hunt down good alternatives; or (as in my case) are having trouble finding one or a few beloved titles in a good/better quality copy and are willing to lay out for it/them, then in either case it could be worth it to you. But that brings me to the not-so-great, which really sorta kills off the likelihood of my buying from BR again. Not-so-great (Lousy IMO): tom port’s intense focus on convincing you that you must be greatly missing out if you don’t buy from him; and in particular, his propagation of the notion that nearly all audiophile LP reissues are crap. While certainly some are bad, and many are questionable, there are also very many that sonically match or exceed better older pressings that in any case may now be hard to find or of exorbitant cost. One case in point- AP’s UHQRs of Steely Dan, with the exception of Pretzel Logic, beat or even slay the originals- but I’m sure Tom Port doesn’t like them. And to be clear, the UHQRs are expensive, but there are so many AP releases in the $40-$60 range that have been excellent as well. Other labels like Rhino High Fidelity, Speakers Corner, ORG, and the like, even many MOFI reissues, are quite good (though MOFI has its issues with other titles, which of course are widely discussed- and many will reject any title of theirs that had a digital stage [which in recent years is all of them]- which I don’t, though I really prefer AAA if possible). IME to find good or great audiophille reissues, knowing the history of the label releasing them and doing some online research about particular title reissues will usually steer you right. Yes, many audiophile reissues may lack some air/subtle definition on top as the original tapes age, but for others (from better-preserved tapes) the difference is quite modest, and on many reissues, the strengths they bring in clarity, extension, balance, and the like more than make up for any losses when the tapes are well-preserved. Based on my experience with BR, I really think that Port exaggerates the differences brought by "hot stampers," and his outlook on audiophile reissues strikes me as fairly absurd. I’m also not buying into the notion of his sound setup being the ne plus ultra that reveals what everyone else except his followers are missing. The value his service may offer to buyers is clouded by his dogma. |
@aubullience - of course he's exaggerating the differences in his 'hot stampers' - he's running a business and he wants you to try out his product; if you like, he's probably got a return customer - if you don't like, you can return. Seems totally fair. |
I bought a Stevie Nix record from "Better"-not one of of the most expensive ones, but still pricey. I just wanted to see if it matched the hype. It is a very good pressing-sounds great, but to me not great enough to justify the price. OTOH, if money wasn't a factor for me, I'd buy a lot of his records-they do sound good. |