The “Off The Shelf” Lie

One major thing in favor of in house production is quality control. When the people who build the product work for the owner/designers directly, parts and quality issues can be identified and addressed quickly and easily. When you outsource, you provide specifications, but how those are achieved is at the discretion of another company whose employees answer to that owner. In the event of a bad batch, it becomes an adversarial issue instead of being resolved in house before manufacturing continues. 

Whether it’s speakers or other components, the ability to hand select parts from a batch or inspect and test each driver at each stage of manufacturing is what drives up costs but also quality. 

Sometimes marketing is a gimmick to raise the desirability of mediocre products but sometimes it’s a way of informing potential customers of why their products are worth the cost. 

Neither the OP nor any of the commenters seem to have mentioned that there's a third option, and that is the speaking is manufactured  by a third-party, such as Focal or Scanspeak, but modified (by the same OEM manufacturer) based on the speaker manufacturer's (such as Wilson) unique needs.

That can be a very valuable, not uncommon, and R&D- and cost-wise probably not a bad option.

The only thing that matters is whether the end sound of your system pleases you.

Some designers are known to turn sows' ears into silk purses. Andrew Jones comes to mind. It's a talent. Others can't help but turn silk purses into sows' ears.

I have a pair of Andrew Jones Pioneer bookshelf speakers I bought at Best Buy for half price, $65.  They’re amazingly good, not super smooth but sparky and enjoyable.  I almost wish I’d bought the floorstanders at the time!

Obviously you can take great parts and make a terrible design and make a good design with average parts. Obviously design matters most but parts still do matter it's about the best parts for the design not the most flashy or most expensive.