"I described my interpretation of RB's statement about the damping effect. RB did not explain the phenomenon; he only mentioned it. Based on my definition of a "diatribe", I would not say that my post contained a diatribe against anything. As to the rest of what you wrote, I don't follow you. No matter what LOMC you are using, you have a choice regarding input impedance of the phono stage or whatever the LOMC is directly driving ahead of the phono inputs. That choice is in addition to all the other elements that you mention. Furthermore, I am not saying that cantilever damping as a result of current through the coils of an LOMC is good or bad; it's just an idea that has been discussed here and elsewhere. Like I did mention, some think it is a problem while some others think it might actually benefit performance by the damping effect. Dave Slagle might want to comment; he does this stuff for a living."
It starts to look like "diatribe" when the OP is asking relatively simple questions that anyone would ask and we're trying to bring him up to speed on the only information that manufacturers and the hi fi press avail to us and you go off on tangents about advanced electrical theory which really just would confuse and create a conundrum for the poor guy.
Given the basic information available to the consumer, even a poster's most "practical knowledge" on these forums should be enough for the OP to make a rational decision about how to move forward and where his money might be best spent. Even using the most inexpensive and rudimentary tools available you can achieve precise results and spectacular sonic performance from budget or very sophisticated hi fi equipment.

