Led Zeppelin II on vinyl


How good or bad are the remastered versions? 
This in example…

https://store.acousticsounds.com/d/96600/Led_Zeppelin-Led_Zeppelin_II-180_Gram_Vinyl_Record
 

I know it’s a digital remaster. Worth getting or should I hunt down a reasonably priced (if there is such a thing) US 1969 pressing?

Any thoughts from Zeppelin fans? What versions are good sounding? Not looking to pay obscene amounts of money for this…thanks!

audphile1

@chrisoshea 

My recommendation is to buy a clean copy of an well regarded version and have it ultrasonically cleaned.

with a bit of effort, you get more for less!!!!

Driving to a record store is fun for a lot of folks.  Also:

Driving to a record store is a chore for a lot of folks.

Even for people that enjoy the experience, that joy can flip when the spouse finds out where they have been spending their time.  ;-)

For those that do not have a reasonably close-by record store, or the time for the excursion, they will buy on-line, and hope that the pressing is as described.  If not, the next phase is an effort in obtaining a refund, and packing it up, and going to the post office, etc.

Also, how does someone determine what is a "well regarded version"?  That requires additional effort.

Whose ear should be trusted, to certify (for lack of a better verb) a well regarded version?  People's opinions on speakers, cables, CD players, etc, are all over the map.

And even when there is a vast consensus on a specific version of an album, that gives you only a shot at great sound quality, and on only one of the two sides.  No two pressings have the same sound quality, and the sound quality can vary significantly, even with the same stamper code.

Better Records rates the sound quality on both sides.  And their description of the pressing will include if there is a click that plays for X rotations.  I know of no other seller that provides the above information.

There is a fair amount of research and labor that goes in to trying to identify a specific version of an album to purchase; more than just a bit.

If you have the time, and you enjoy that labor, then you have it made.

Better Records takes the guess work out of the process, and saves you the labor.  You are paying for their labor.  They did the shopping, and the cleaning, and the listening, for you.  And you are paying for all of their rejects that they purchased and will not sell on their site -- and they know the right stampers to seek out, and still they get duds.  So we would also purchase duds, if we did all of the research and ordering ourselves.

And the above is rinse and repeat for every album title we are lusting after.

Every record that I have purchased from Better Records has been the best I have heard.  Yet, I have returned a few, because even the best sounding versions of some titles were not worth even $10 to me.  The digital version, which also was not too good, was $1.69 (for an individual song).  So I sent back pressings that cost $200+.

But the rest I have kept, and have no buyer's remorse.

And I guess that how-revealing someone's stereo is, is a factor.  On an entry level stereo, the much better sounding pressing will not shine as much on such a stereo.  When I was a teenager, with an $800 stereo, I never noticed a sound quality difference in any of my records.

What a great album and group...I have a newer reissue but I like my original copy. It's killer....

If you like live albums, as I recall "How The West Was Won" is great on vinyl.

Here’s a story for you all…

So I get my Zep 2 in mail today. I’m all excited. Washed it and it’s in decent shape, a solid VG/VG+

Throw it on the table and my heart sinks. It sounds like dog schiit compared to my scratched up LP that was gifted to me. I mean the difference in sound quality is night and day, staggering! I listen to both sides. Massive disappointment. I’m in pieces…
 

So I pull my wifi microscope that I just got 2 days ago to periodically inspect the stylus, and I look at the LP runout of the copy I just received from discogs. Nothing out of the ordinary. The numbering matches the label.
And then I take the microscope to the scratched up LP that I originally had, and what I saw immediately explained the difference in sound quality.
The LP I had is the damn RL!!! Both sides RL on the runout.
The first side is badly scratched up and I won’t even play it.
Side 2 is playable with surface scuffs nothing deep. Has crackles but still enjoyable 
So there…I’m a dumba$$. Lol 

But in my defense (sort of) I didn’t make out RL on this record with a naked eye and because of its shape I didn’t bother with the magnifying glass. Good news bad news…now I need to find an RL with destroyed side 2 but good side 1, and I have the whole album.