I was recently comparing the official studio masters (some 24 bit files) to the vinyl master for a couple of albums.
Stuff on the low end’s gone, stuff on the top end’s gone (this album really needed it not gone, certainly not artist intent)....with a pestilent midbass and bizarre eq sht done to it...pure trash, i seriously can’t believe some of the TRASH masters that get pressed on the vinly plastic.
Some mind numbing bozos will deliberately lose things that were present in the music, so they can stick to their faulty bozo medium of loyalty, i suppose....It is no freaking "real deal".
I’ve been tinkering with some AI tools to reclaim the sht that was lost on some very old vinyl i’ve been trying to archive....rather not name any of the botched recent albums because the starving artist relies on some physical medium purchases to make a living wage. Streaming didn’t pay diddly. Buy the CD or the digital hires album if you like the album you heard/sampled on qobuz.
It may not be about sound quality, but it is - at the core of things - what’s really implied; there’s the underlying notion that physical media playback, certainly analogue in the shape of LP’s is "the real deal" and will always hold the upper hand in regards to sound quality. Maybe that’s true, ultimately in a more all-out approach, but who among us can really claim that mantle (other than just borrowing it)?

