Roon vs Qobuz Connect


Yes the title is misleading because Qobuz is a server and Roon is an aggregator. But this question is for all those who stream Qobuz via Roon, or via Qobuz Connect (QC).

There is little doubt that QC sounds significantly better than Roon streaming Qobuz. Admittedly a subjective opinion, but for all of those who agree:

The advantages of Roon in integrating personal and external sources are obvious. To counter this, I can run a small local server and access my personal collection via Qobuz. But the aggregation sucks overall. 

What can I do to have my QC cake and eat it too? I’d love to hear about any clever tweaks to imitate Roon’s capabilities, while keeping QC quality. 

debrajray

 

1. Use fixed volume in Roon, bypassing Roon’s software volume control;
2. Disable normalization or ’Volume Leveling’ feature;
3. Disable any sample rate conversion by setting "MAX PCM" in Device Setup; and
4.Turn off the DSP engine in Roon.

Now I have no choice but to use Roon. I replaced my streamer with a ethernet-enabled DAC that exposes a Roon endpoint (or UPnP) but doesn't have streaming capabilities built-in otherwise. 

I also do as suggested above. When I had a streamer I tried Qobuz Connect: it was marginally better than using Roon with the above suggestions. I had a problem with the user experience with Qobuz' controller anyway, and went back to using Roon for Qobuz. In any case, my new DAC with Roon sounds better than my old streamer with QC.

Hi @lanx0003 you’re right, of course, and I have already done those things a while ago, including the disabling of all mqa decoding and rendering, as I don’t have any mqa sources. All to reduce overhead. I don’t believe that fixed volume vs device volume makes any appreciable difference though. It’s not that Roon is sending a digitally attenuated signal with its volume control; it’s just controlling the hardware directly. Switching to Fixed Volume would only remove Roon’s participation in volume control messaging, not change the signal path. Any sonic difference there would have to come from control-plane behavior rather than sample processing, and it’s hard to see how that alone would account for a consistent QC vs Roon difference.

At this point it seems more accurate to say we’re comparing RAAT to Qobuz Connect’s native implementation on a given platform. That’s why I was hoping for some smart tweaks from “Qobuz connectors”. I don’t see how anything else can be done on the roon side. I should have said all this in the first place :-)

@dwette slightly confused; what is doing the streaming for you now? The rabbit hole that awaits you is a standalone streamer plus your new dac plus QC …

@debrajray I have a Weiss DAC501-MK2. It has an ethernet input that exposes a Roon endpoint (or UPnP if one prefers). It has no streaming capabilities otherwise, but Roon is all I really need. 

On very rare occasion I have – in the past – used AirPlay2 to stream Youtube audio from my laptop browser over WiFi. Just yesterday, I bought a WiiM Mini for just that purpose; i.e., to support AirPlay2. I don’t plan to use it otherwise, and I also don’t plan to get a separate streaming transport. I have what I need.

 

@dwette got it. The Weiss 501-mk2 is fully network enabled and talks directly to Roon core. I use the Moon 891 which is a streamer-dac and hence the choice arises between Qobuz via Roon or just Qobuz.