The argument against upgrading


I’ve always assumed upgrading hifi can be worthwhile provided there is some audible improvement in sound quality. Maybe, this assumption should be challenged.

Let’s suppose I make some change to my system. I make a meaningful comparison that proves it sounds better in some way.

Before making the change, I was already able to get into and enjoy certain recordings. Surely, I can’t get into these recordings any more than that. It’s an either or thing not a matter of degree.

So what does the upgrade actually do for me in practice? I fear that more often than not it may be absolutely nothing.

I am not arguing that there is no better. Just that incrementally better may not necessarily always translate into more musical enjoyment.

I suppose this all begs the question what I actually mean by better.

What’s your view on the benefits of upgrading? How can we reliably assess whether it is effective?

newton_john

@newton_john   I think it could be argued that musical involvement isn't necessarily an all-or-nothing experience.  Both the degree of involvement can be variable--I think--as well as the number of recordings that can elicit involvement.

So, this past year I upgraded both my streamer and DAC.  Both were significant upgrades, not merely lateral changes.  Now, I find I can enjoy more CD-quality streams than before, not hearing as many faults.

I agree with others who have said that upgrading speakers and improving room acoustics are sensible priorities over other changes.  I've gone as far as I'm willing to go in those areas, and I'm satisfied with what I have.  My speakers and core components are good enough that I can hear changes from other components, including cables.  I'm not suggestible enough to hear differences from all changes--e.g., lifting my speaker cables so they don't touch carpeting didn't make any difference I've noticed, and my speaker cables are over 20 ft. long.

There is a virtue to being satisfied with what one has; I'm afraid many audiophiles lack that ability.  And probably many make changes in the wrong areas, like changing cables, adding tweaks, etc. when the biggest flaws in their systems are their speakers or room acoustics.

Reading all posts i realize that many people dont know how to listen to their system/room as an acoustic whole...

Then  they are unable to detect the necessary optimization move...

We must know what we listen to with a concept...

If we dont have an acoustic concept we cannot think about our own perceptive evaluation:

What is timbre ? what are the factors able to modify it in my environment and not only from the gear pieces design...

What is dynamic how to improve it ?

What is ASW/LV and how to change this immersivity  ratio in my room ?

 

 With no acoustic concept in their head, many had  marketing publicity as the only possible answer... Buying an upgrade become the solution, the costlier the better... They forgot and dont even try to optimize what they already own, they will never listen to their system at his peak potential...

i owned a pair of Tannoy dual gold for 40 years... I sold them before learning acoustics... What an idiot i was....I never listened to my Tannoy at their peak potential...i never used them in an optimal mechanical,electrical,acoustical conditions...

sad

I learned basics only after selling them alas! ....

 

 

 

The Hedonic treadmill existed long before “ marketing “…

personally I’m stuck between Can’t Buy a Thrill and Everything Must Go but counting on Two ( channel ) against Nature to unravel my Pretzel Logic…