That parasound certainly didn’t deserve a 5000 dollar preamp.
I highly doubt any 70+ year or even 45+ year old end user forum guy’s ears have some critical listening ability as good as the soundmaster guys at yamaha, , luxman, whatever.
And oh yes, the measurement....keep measuring till the day’s blue,,,,i am sure you’ll see a flat FR with all these amps and sinad within some ballpark. I’ve had a AP kit for years...It’s real boring, y’know, keep measuring sht that doesn’t have any major deficiencies, all within a ballpark of engineering competence, but, all sounds different... But, I am sure the ASR guys claim all amps sound the same, so you can sleep easy (don’t get all stressed out).
a) The A23+ was rated around 9/10 based on professional reviews, not anecdotal impressions from casual users / average joe like you. Under that context, it is difficult to argue that it is not a great piece of equipment.
b) You appear to assume you know the original poster well enough to discount his assessment, even referencing his age (over 70) as a basis to question his ability to characterize sound. That is an ad-hominem argument, not a technical one. Familiarity with a person’s age does not supersede objective evaluation of sound quality.
If the discussion is about audio performance, then it should be grounded in engineering, measurements, and critical listening criteria, not assumptions about the listener. Most importantly, try to control yourself and avoid personal attacks. Doing otherwise will only reflect your own shortcomings. Do you actually understand sound reproduction well enough to refute the assessment on technical or sonic grounds?

