Why redbook over SACD?


Why are there designers of expensive cd transports who do not include the possibility of playing SACDs? Only redbook.

I know this is a choice. They do not believe in this technology.

Why is that?

roxy1927

cos SACD adds nothing. if Redbook is dereived from a master that is excellent, SACD is just a needless pain

I believe it has more to do with the transport mechanism. All things being equal a purpose built mechanism that is limited to Redbook only can potentially do a better job playing Redbook CDs than a SACD capable mechanism can do when playing Redbook CDs.

The issue might also be a response to the market.  Redbook CD has rebounded to respectable sales levels

That’s just completely untrue — CD sales are down 97% from their 2000 peak and are bumping along at 33 million units comparable to what they were in the late 80s, and even vinyl is far outselling CDs at this point.  From RIAA data…
 

Physical sales dipped in the first half of the year, with vinyl revenues down 1% and CD revenues down a sizable 22.3%, so that physical revenues at large slipped 5.9%. Vinyl now significantly outsells CD, with vinyl shifting nearly twice as many units and generating more than four times the revenue. Total vinyl revenues for January to June were $456.9 million, while CD revenues were $108.1 million.