OP - I completely agree and well said!
I sprung for the Roon lifetime membership prior to the price increases. I then started to have anxiety when Harman International (Samsung) moved forward with the acquisition of Roon. Fortunately, it would appear that Harman honored Roon remaining as a standalone business, while Roon benefited from a greater amount of resources under the Harman umbrella. Since this point, I’ve felt that Roon has become more stable.
Within the framework of streaming, I personally think the user interface is extremely important.
Things I really appreciate about Roon:
- Tags: which allow you to organize genres and moods to playlists, songs, albums, or artists. Tabs for digital streaming is the equivalent of physical cabinet dividers and tabs, but within my Roon library via Roon remote on the iPad.
- Bookmarks: which allow you to literally bookmark any page/window in Roon.
- Simplistic layout that allows me to navigate from point A to point B within seconds, without having to navigate through podcasts I’ll never listen to (referring to Spotify’s UI).
- Digital balance control
- And most importantly, portability with major streamer manufacturers
In respect to sound quality, I really don’t have any complaints, but there’s healthy discussion and experiences concerning how Roon may fall short in this category depending on streamer (whether optimized for Roon) or compared to a streamer’s native OS. One of the ways that I’ve experimented to bypass this potential bottleneck is by using HQ Player for processing/upsampling on a MacBook in the background which has yielded both positive and interesting results.
Nonetheless, I haven’t regretted the lifetime purchase and feel like it’s a pillar within my listening experience.

