deep_333,
The world of correlating measurements with characteristics of sound is indeed murky. But it is quite clear that dynamic drivers in a box yield an overlay of warm, veiled (whatever you want to call it) sound, compared to boxless lower mass electrostatic or ribbon drivers. I haven't heard open baffle dynamic speakers, but I accept the claims of advocates that open battle yields lower coloration than boxed dynamic speakers. Dynamic tweeters can be good, due to their lower mass and limited excursion, all adding up to controlled, low mass with lower distortion than lower frequency drivers.
I am not a plant for Martin Logan stats. Curved panels have more time smear than flat panels. And large panels have more time smear than smaller panels. Indeed, I have heard small box speakers like Rogers LS 3/5a that have better accuracy than large panels, such as the awful 4 foot square Dayton Wright electrostatic. The best illustration of my verbiage is the YT video comparing one of the best dynamics, the TAD CR1 against the current favorite stat, Popori. The Popori is a flawed large panel, but the essential point is the midrange which is clearly less colored than the TAD.
