Your personal assessment of the value of teajay's information has nothing to do with the point I am attempting to make. If you think that a reviewer posting a notice of his review on an independent site on behalf of an entity which profits directly from visitation is not an ethical misstep then we differ. Further he saves you the trouble of reading the review by giving you his opinion of the piece in the first sentence.
Shame too. I just ordered a piece that he reviewed and purchased in the last year or so.

