Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

In every case better resolution means more musicality: more leading edge, more reverb, more decay, more spaciousness. Conversely edginess and stridency are the result of distortion, not resolution. In order to get musicality you need good rendition of harmonics resulting from overtones being transmitted with phase coherence and lack of distortion. So resolution and musicality are synonymous rather than opposite ends of the spectrum

carlos269 

i can hear how less detailed information sometimes has a flow and smoothness that is less attention grabbing and it is easier on the brain to process, which tends to allows for a deeper immersion or engagement.

Yes, some people prefer the sound of very lo-res recordings, such as mp3 files played on their phone with earbuds. That’s why you’re enjoying your YouTube videos! There’s nothing wrong with that preference, of course. But that’s not "high fidelity" which by definition is truthfulness (fidelity) to the source. 

atmasphere

A system lacking resolution will be at a disadvantage with the best recordings out there ... I just don’t see how an argument for less resolution could really hold up, unless the person making that argument had never heard equipment that is both relaxed and detailed at the same time. 

Exactly. I don’t understand the advantage of taking a fine recording, and then using a compressed, lossy version of it for evaluation.

@kerrybh  Please don’t take offense. This is a conversation and not a proclamation. Everyone is free to contribute with their own thoughts and experience on the subject. I simply meant that if all three audio recordings of my systems sound the same to you then that is very interesting.

@cleeds How do you gauge and measure sound reproduction systems’ truthfulness to the source? What is the standard for analyzing, assessing, and scoring the fidelity to the source of home audio systems?

Dear @atmasphere   " the best systems are both relaxed and detailed. Detail must not come at the cost of brightness and harshness.  ".

 

Live MUSIC listen at near field position normally is not " relaxed " and and sometimes could be brigthness and even harshness, example:listening a horn/trumpet or sax alto .

What I try tomean is that ot all depends wwhat is in the recording where additional

comes with " errors " in the whole recording proccess and matering but in live MUSIC that brigthness and harshness sometimes is part of the natural color of the score.

Several times the live MUSIC dynamics, transients response, power and the like preclude/avoid that " relaxed " characteristic you are talking about and in a home system exist to many additional variables for your statement can be true. Sometimes could be but not as a rule.

 

My syetm is relaxed when the recording is it and always has high resolution with an almost zeronoise floor. Distortion levels  arelow too, example: I take out all electronics input fuses and almost all electronics/speakers/elctrical power line are connected with out any kind of input/output connectors but wire soldered directly to the boards and the like. Yes, I enjoy it.

 

R.