Do upgraded LAN cables/purifiers/switch box make a difference. What is recommended, if so?


Streamer / DAC is Orchard Audio PecanPi+ connected to a TP-Link SG105 switch with a slightly better than basic Ethernet cable. This in turn is connected to the wall  (with same quality Ethernet cable).

 

For completeness, the PecanPi+ is connected via XLR to Benchmark HPA4 -> Benchmark AHB2 (bridged-mono) driving Martin Logan ESL 9's.

 

Analog (Clearaudio Concept Turntable) was upgraded (Sumiko Blue Point 3 MC, Benz Micro Lukaschek PP1 phono with SBooster power supply). This improved sound TT sound quality.

 

Now I'm looking for tweaks to the digital chain to make a difference. FWIW the streaming sound quality is already great. Don't want to spend more than USD 750 on all tweaks. 

 

Would appreciate comments / recommendations.

johannm
kerrybh

. . .  but no one can definitively tell you what will sound "best" to you.

+1    Everybody’s system is different.   

The goal is to address Conducted EMI - and - Radiated EMI.    Fortunately, there are multiple solutions.   Whichever one works best for you - is the right one for you.

@mclinnguy, good point about his system photos which indicate a system capable of revealing differences. The point I was trying to make is that regardless of the quality of the switch, audiophile or not, that unless the last bit of cable is unshielded the noise (EMI/RFI) is allowed to travel along a conductive path and pollute the analogue side of your DAC. Sure, a better quality switch with more attention paid to the ingress of noise will bring better results.

@kerrybh, the dealer who brought you some quality switches to audition might not have fully understood the importance of using an unshielded cable as the final connection to your system.

 

I only suggested the inexpensive switch and cable as a quick test to see if you notice any improvement. If your dealer was unaware and used a high-end audiophile Cat 7 or 8 shielded cable, the switch's benefits wouldn’t be evident. I’ve encountered dealers who are unaware and just trying to upsell as much as possible. That said, I don’t know your dealer and mean no disrespect.

@steakster, after checking out photos of your system and reading one of your posts, I noticed you mentioned Fidelizer. I installed Fidelizer Pro and experienced an immediate and significant improvement across the spectrum. I was curious if you’ve tried his Hyperlink Network Switch or the Nimitra Streamer.

By the way, you might know me as lemonhaze. Audiogon seems to have mixed things up somehow indecision

Disinterested readers can please skip the follong non-audio paragraph below.

In mid-January, my wife and I will be skippering the owner and his wife around the southwestern Caribbean on a stunning Vision 444 catamaran for four months. It’s taken us nine years to prepare our leaky Irish stone cottage for sale, but it’s finally done. I’ll be buying a cat soon after the sale and my offer to you still stands.

Charles

 

 

"unless the last bit of cable is unshielded the noise (EMI/RFI) is allowed to travel along a conductive path and pollute the analogue side of your DAC"

@gournard - If the switch provides galvanic and noise isolation, how much EMI/RFI is likely to ride on a 1M length of shielded Ethernet cable between the switch and a DAC?  How about isolating filters like the Muon Pro, does the final pigtail of cable between the filter and the DAC negate all the purported noise reduction improvements?  Have you heard these differences by comparing a short length of shielded vs. non shielded cable from switch to DAC?

I am curious because I thought the purpose of shielding Ethernet cables was to protect against electromagnetic interference (EMI)? Also, don’t Ethernet connections inherently include galvanic isolation via transformers?