John DeVore talks about Knob Feel


Anyone here watched John DeVore discuss “knob feel” — the tactile, sensory interaction you have with your gear as much as the sonic result. 

I know exactly what John DeVore means when he talks about knob feel. My Garrard 301, Degritter UCM and Softone Model IV phono are perfect examples — they exude that precise, tactile satisfaction that makes every interaction a small joy. There’s a deliberate weight and smooth resistance to the controls that you just don’t find often anymore.

It’s funny how something as simple as turning a knob can heighten the whole listening ritual — it connects you physically to the gear and, in a way, to the music itself. That sense of craftsmanship and intentionality reminds you why we love this hobby. Remote control be damned.

For those of us obsessed with system synergy, this is a reminder: don’t ignore the physical interface. The best sounding phono stage, tube amp or speaker might still feel “off” if the user interaction is clunky. That little detail influences how you listen, which affects how the music lands.

If you’ve got gear with excellent tactile controls (volume, input selector, tone controls, etc.), I’d love to hear: does the knob feel contribute to your listening enjoyment? Or do you consider it secondary to performance?

https://youtu.be/Z7of4DcX_sY?si=PlFcLc86PNomBa1k

lalitk

Talk about click bait.  When I realized you were talking about stereo equipment I became more interested.  How old and sad am I lol.  Knob feel goes to adding touch as another sense that equipment engages.  I want equipment that sounds and looks great and feels high end when I’m using it.  Like the look and feel of buttons and knobs in a luxury car.  I guess the only sense left is taste - nah I’m not going to go there.  

Post removed 

I understand the knob appeal, but since most of us likely control our equipment with the remote more often, it deserves similar discussion. I have been through five different remotes for different preamps and an integrated over as many years, and I don’t think enough focus is placed on thieves design. There is the minimalist design, like Schiit, the tactility of the blister buttons is weak and it is difficult to make small adjustments, and the small size gets lost easily. Or the maximalist solution, Pass and Audionet, milling a square ingot of aluminum not meant to fit in a human hand with soulless eraser head buttons.
 

The best remote I had out of the five was for the Benchmark preamp. It was aluminum, but right sized, and milled to fit in your hand. The buttons were nice to touch and offered very fine adjustments, by being easy to click, but not so easy that you could inadvertently press the wrong buttons and interrupt your music (Audionet). Yes it would still hurt if you dropped it on your foot, but wouldn’t require a trip to urgent care.

Remotes are the new knobs, but seem to be a bit of an afterthought in some cases. 

My hifi has a wonderfully precise and smooth large illuminated multifunction knob on top. Unfortunately, I rarely touch it because I’m usually a couple of meters away with a remote control or iPad in my hand. 

I used to love the elegant draw mechanism of my CD12, but that’s nearly twenty years in the past now. I have to make do with the delicate arm lift lever of my turntable.

@zlone 

Agreed, remotes should deserve some credit as well. But most supplied remotes are disappointing as you pointed out!  

I’m continually impressed by the Accuphase supplied remotes — sturdy-metal body, appropriately sized and that signature champagne-gold finish, buttons with real tactile presence. The housing alone tells you this isn’t your run-of-the-mill remote: metal, weight to it, a machine-built feel.

Beyond cosmetics the controls, layout matters: the button actuation is firm but smooth, with real “click” feedback (not mushy membrane). That mechanical precision adds to the sense of build integrity.

In short: the remote should reflect the high quality and top $$$$ of the accompanying component.