are you serious?
@mahgister Can you provide here one testable claim that shows a flaw in Amir’s approach?
you did not understood a word of what i said it seems...
Amir has no flaws , it is worst than a flaw all his methodology is grounded in a misunderstanding of the nature and working of hearing...
Asking me this question proves to me you had not read nor understood what Kunchur, Van Maanen, Magnasco and Oppenheim. Akpan J. Essien and the others many experiments said about hearing... Have you read the two articles i posted about timbre perception and their impact on acoustics understanding ?
No it seems...
Bodily maps of musical sensations across cultures
Why dont you ask Kunchur opinion the expert is him not me ? i am only someone reading him and others:
«
Mr. Majidimehr has serious deficits in his understanding of key concepts:
(1) Signal analysis for evaluating audio fidelity has 2 broad domains: Frequency (spectral) and time (temporal). To focus on only one of these is like approaching audio assessment with only half a brain. A spectrum analyzer focuses on only the first and is not best suited for studying impulse response and transients, which are influential in defining instrumental timbre. Also Fourier
representations cannot properly describe transfer functions of non-linear and non-time-invariant systems. Mr. Majidimehr’s instrumentation and basis of analyzing audio fidelity is fundamentally
flawed.»
Why do you think he say that?
Why he is right ?
Because as demonstrated by among others Magnasco and Oppenheim about the Fourier uncertainty and hearing, we need an "ecological theory of hearing" ...
What is an ecological theory of hearing ?
Do you think Amir know and understand the founder of ecological perception theory one of the greatest psychologist of the last century J.J. Gibson working for the army of US studying the gaze of pilot driving their plane on aircraft carrier ?
No...
And you ask me what is the flaw in Amir methods and his use of his tools ?
His flaw is his ideological imposed interpretation of his set of measures as the truth replacing hearings by his dials..
He market ASR he did not scientific research...Kunchur and the others scientists i quoted do science....He mocked them to make a point here discussing his site... thats all ...
A tool manual as dogma is not science...