bits is bits

While I understand the concept of digital perfect transmission and error correction etc I assume there is also a software driver, firmware, decoder, or whatever unique to each service Tidal, Qobuz, Amazon.

Roon uses RAAT. What is Tidal and Qobuz?

@mswale 

You're absolutely right, but you're kinda missing the point too.

Most audiophiles have come around by now to the realization that TCP is indeed bit-perfect - period. The competent ones.

At issue is parasitic noise that travels via metallic cabling and can cause audible artifacts when picked up by poorly isolated and / or designed components. 

"Metallic" is the operating word here. As @yyzsantabarbara explains in his post above, just locate noisy network stuff in a separate room, plugged in a separate branch circuit, and run SFP cable (fiber) from that room to your system. The physical separation of those noisy components, combined with the inability of glass cabling to pick up or transmit EMI and RFI, ensures that the TCP data that reaches your streamer is not only bit-perfect but noise-free as well.

Or, you can spend thousands of dollars plugging your modem and router into twee little audiophile power supplies and network filters and connecting the whole kit with cryogenically treated silver CAT-6 cables, yet ultimately fail to reduce noise to the same extent as distance combined with fiber cable.

I’m just guessing here, but maybe the difference is in the equipment Qobuz uses before the tunes hit the interwebs.  Just like if you play a CD on your system and you swap a preamp, a DAC or amplifier it’s going to sound different.

Just a thought.

@curiousjim I’m just guessing here, but maybe the difference is in the equipment Qobuz uses before the tunes hit the interwebs. ..,

I did not post the results, but yesterday I did a deep search multi-layered query about the differences between Qobuz vs. Tidal vs. Amazon vs. Apple vs Spotify and the "differences in sound quality" and "why we can hear differences". 

What came back was more different about each than what I would have expected, starting with different mastering versions of music, and then differences between FLAC and other non-FLAC versions that get transmitted for starters, and what actually occurs between each of these service providers before packets get transmitted across an IP network to your home and streamers/dacs, next.  

Each of you can do your own queries and debate from there with yourselves one way or the other, but I walked away interpreting that all bits and are not the same, and each of these service providers are not the same in what you receive on the receiving end. Some of them are messing with it on their end, before transmission and will leave it at that.  Qobuz did get praised for being the must untouched FLAC files and untouched service though, and most here seem to already know this. It might be worth retesting 3-4 of them and validate what differences you can hear first hand. I can hear differences on my system, for the five I’ve tried. So, "Bits /= Bits" in this case on what was originated, sent, received for all of the service providers mentioned so far. Check again, listen again, and compare again fwiw.   

I don't get why someone would have multiple streaming services and use each one independently. Based on reports that each streaming service has unique sound qualities, and the idea your streaming setup should be optimized for each player, this doesn't make sense. I have my entire music library on one server, this include Tidal and Qobuz, Roon provides the music player so there is no unique or differentiated sound from my Qobuz or Tidal music files. I've also optimized my streaming setup for Roon and Roon only. 

I'm not going to debate whether these streaming services offer unique sound qualities since I don't use their music player software. I'd only say a music file is bits is bits, the differentiated sound quality would be due to the music player software these services offer and how your streaming equipment interacts or works with them.