It wasn't a budget helper at about $450 here in Europe 😳 but in regards to the rest of the gear it's coffee change or there about 😆
- ...
- 52 posts total
Sorry, but this does not work very well, if at all. By ear yes, but it helps to know you're in the ballpark to start with. |
Exactly, get in the ballpark visually, (ignore the dial) then refine by ear, using what LP______? AFTER: everything else is verified, anti-skate is last AFTER: Your system’s balance is proven by the CD version of whatever content you are using. Then use the LP version of known content and known imaging ...................................................... Just last night, listening to a friends system, track 3 ... the left channel disappeared. Nobody walking around, nobody touched anything. WTF Turned out to be a loose RCA connector on the back of the Phono stage. That’s why I changed to all LOCKING connectors, either Locking XLR (they all do not lock); or cables with Locking RCA connectors, or modify your existing cables with these connectors from parts express https://www.parts-express.com/Locking-RCA-Plug-Solder-Type-2-Pair-091-1270?quantity=1 The channel disappeared completely, easy to be aware off, find and fix, but many times you can get a partial signal, unaware your balance might be off |
I used to own a VPI JRM (?) Memorial tone arm. If you wanted skate control you could give a twist the wires going into the tone arm in the correct direction and it would provide a small outward force on the tone arm. It tried with and without and found a twist was better. I appreciate this approach and thought it captured the importance of anti-skate. It was worth throwing a bit of force into it... but didn’t need to be incredibly accurately dialed in. I know, this would rub a bunch of folks the wrong way. I enjoyed it. The table really sounded amazing, so never felt like anti-skate was THE big parameter to worry about.
My tone arm today has fine calibrations. But then it cost three or four times more. |
- 52 posts total

