Eliminating spade connectors, upgrading bits, soldering all of it in


Sharing, fwiw. Following a practice a local upgrade colleague did inside a Class A amplifier for me, I recently did the same type of thing on a pair of custom speakers I built for myself a few years back. The idea is around eliminating the last of any low grade connections I could find to see if I could upgrade the sound a little more.  Finally got some time to do it recently, and reporting first results and questions floating around in my head now. Wished I had gotten to this sooner, actually.   

Changes:

1. Removed a quad of quality gold plated spade connectors from speaker crossovers to rear speaker terminal (bi-wire binding posts) on the back of my main audio system speakers.   

2. Removed average run of the mill brass gold plated speaker terminals you can buy at Madisound or Solen. I always intended to replace these, and finally got to it. 

3. Added Cardas Copper binding posts, two pairs, for bi-wire configuration speaker connections to replace the prior pairs just removed. Sat in boxes a few years...

4. Soldered everything back together with Cardas solder thus elminating all prior quality gold spade connectors, internal speaker wire soldered directly. All spades eliminated. 

5. Also noting these new/better and more secure connections from my existing Cardas speaker cables to the new Cardas binding posts just installed

1st Listening Day:

Wishful thinking or not, I've been listening for a while, and something became immediately apparent now in question.  Woah, is it actually smoother on top and is the detail down into the upper midrange actually coming through with a little more and nicer "texture" now?  I could attest it seems like I can hear a little bit more "out there", too nah, really, hmmm. Really liking the added change with tone/texture. Puzzling.  

Setup - first testing with my Class A 50 watt solid state amplifier, and can say its already approching the smoothness of my tube amps in terms of tone, texture, and how it reveals details in a smooth way. The prior connections were good, nothing wrong, well crimped, I checked all of it before converting everything over. 

I really was NOT expecting this type of change, kinda scratching my head.  Its caused me to pause letting go of some of this gear too.

I'm not sure if anyone has encountered this kind of change with such [seemingly] small changes. Hmmm. Should have known better, my prior pair of speakers had everything all soldered in like this with no spades.  Maybe just a few weak links I had. Okay, just sharing in case anyone wants to comment or debate it at all. :) 

 

 

decooney

Connectors are a convenience design, with this as the goal, there will be compromises, of which one will be a End Sound that is not presenting as well as it could.

With a different thought for how the Signal can pass from Xover to Speaker Driver, there are improvements to be found, just as there are similar experiences has through using exchange components on a Xover, where a improved signal path is put in place.

This same compromise is present upstream at all umbilical’s and their terminations.

Additionally, the connections to the chassis and the wire design for the signal path within the chassis are all worthwhile getting familiar with, as changes made are able to offer much more of what has just been discovered by considering the Speakers signal path.

I don't  observe anyone trying to oversell these modifications. For sure we're at the marginal gains edge of things here, the fundamental components like amps and speakers  remain as most critical/important aspects. Thing is many of us have discovered a certain critical mass of marginal gains can result in much more than a slight improvement. 

 

Some manufactures understand this, others not. I recall my interactions with Bobby of Merlin loudspeakers fame, his obsession with marginal gains resulted in increasingly better sounding speakers throughout their production history. You see this with other manufacturers as well, they understand marginal gains can offer real advancements in sound quality. These marginal changes can also offer improvements  in spec's and reliability. 

 

And I assume most of us into the art of diy are also well acquainted with voicing, we've experienced lateral and regressive  effects from some of our mods. As for expectation bias, the negative and lateral experiences  bring about  an inherent control for this, expectation bias only works in short run at best, over time you'll hear the downsides if they exist. 

Its an "option" for those intrigued and motivated to make a change.  

Some of my former standard version reference speakers were all spade connected to crossovers and terminals.  The same speakers, if you wanted to send them in for upgrades to the "signature" version, were often times upgraded with connectors eliminated and soldered on at all internal connection points. Had a few pairs of standard and signature version Canadian made Totem Acoustic speakers set up like this, and compared both side by side on many occasions. 

My other tube preamp and monoblock tube amplifiers are 95% point to point wired soldered-in connections with minimalist number of connectors in the signal path. Primarily seen more in boutique low-volume production units with no factory imposed time limit on assembly. Sound better than my former circuit board based units too. So it kinda comes down to whatever floats your boat perhaps.  Enjoy!   

Attack - Coherence - Dynamics - Micro Dynamics - Envelope - Timbre - Tone

If anybody wants to experience these attractive elements within the structure of the sound be produced, they have to be worked for.

To form the opinion these elements that structure sound are able to be delivered with a defining presence is created by simply putting devices together, has a lot of experimenting to go through, if they really want to understand what is possible.